We shouldn’t blame AI for the stupid things that people do

You might have noticed that there’s a tiny bit of anxiety about artificial intelligence these days — its design, its implementation, its uses and misuses, its reason for existing at all. Is it ruining society? Is it making our kids stupid? Is it going to kill us? Etc. A lot of this anxiety takes the form of articles about terrible things that AI is either doing directly or is somehow involved in. AI is stealing the work of underpaid artists! AI is telling people to put glue on their pizza! AI is convincing people they are gods or have supernatural powers! AI is making people commit suicide! And so on. I should point out that I’m not making light of any of these outcomes (except maybe the pizza thing), and especially not the last two — it’s not easy when someone you love is emotionally disturbed or mentally ill, and the effects of these kinds of disorders can be profound.

That said, however, I think there’s a problem with much of this kind of coverage of artificial intelligence, and it’s similar to some of the early coverage of the internet, or of many other new technologies (the printing press, for example). I recall a spate of stories blaming Craigslist for thefts and murders and a host of other things, because the thief or killer had used Craigslist to find the house they robbed or the person they murdered. This got lots of clicks for the outlets in question, but it never made sense to me — what if the thief or murderer made contact with someone using the phone, or a newspaper classified ad? Would we blame AT&T, or the publisher, or the guy who sold the classified?

Maybe we would do the latter if the ad said “Male, 34, looking for house to rob,” or “Wanted: someone to murder,” but apart from that it seems odd to blame the intermediary, unless they could have anticipated the eventual outcome. If someone puts glue on their pizza because ChatGPT tells them to, whose fault is that? It’s clear that the AI screwed up in providing this advice — although in many cases the advice comes from human beings making jokes or engaging in pranks, rather than an AI confabulation (as AI pioneer Geoff Hinton likes to call them). But a human being still had to decide to do something stupid as a result. If you try to use a child’s inflatable bath toy as a life preserver and die, is the manufacturer at fault for not including a warning label advising you not to?

Note: This is a version of my Torment Nexus newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “We shouldn’t blame AI for the stupid things that people do”

Judge says AI engines can index books but can’t pirate them

Ever since ChatGPT first emerged on the scene in 2022, there has been a vociferous debate about whether the indexing (or “scraping”) of public content that AI companies do when they are training a large-language model should be considered an infringement of the copyright held by publishers and/or the authors of those books, or whether it should be covered by the “fair use” exemption in US copyright law. As some of you may know, I have consistently been on the latter side of the debate — in a piece for the Columbia Journalism Review and then an edition of The Torment Nexus, I argued that the scraping or indexing of public content by LLMs should be legally no different than the indexing of books that Google did in the early 2000s as part of its Google Books project. After a court case that lasted for a number of years, judge Denny Chin ruled in 2013 that Google’s indexing of content was covered by the fair-use exemption because he believed it to be a “transformative” use, which is one of the four factors that judges have to take into account when they are making a decision. As I wrote last year:

Judges have to balance the competing elements of the “four factor” test, namely: 1) What is the purpose of the use? In other words, is it intended as parody or satire, is it for scholarly research or journalism, etc. 2) What is the nature of the original work? Is it artistic in nature? Is it fiction or nonfiction? 3) How much of the original does the infringing use involve — is it an excerpt or the entire work? and 4) What impact does the infringing use have on the market for the original? In the Google Books case, the scanning of millions of books was not done for research or journalism, in many cases the books in question were creative works of fiction, the entire book was copied, and the Authors Guild argued that it would have a negative impact on the market. One element in Google’s favour, however, was that while its indexing process made copies of the whole book, its search engine never showed users the entire thing.”

As you can see from the four factors, a fair-use decision is effectively a balancing act between different and competing interests: the interests of the author and/or publisher, in protecting and making money from their works, and the interest of the public in having “transformative” uses of art available to them. This kind of balancing is necessary because copyright itself was designed as a balancing act, between the commercial interests of creators and the public benefit of freely available artistic work — to “promote the progress of science and useful arts,” as the US Constitution describes it. Some authors and publishers (but not all) believe that copyright’s sole purpose is to enrich creators, but that’s not accurate; revenue for creators is important, but so is society’s interest in having publicly available and usable art. Judge Chin decided that the scanning of books in order to make them searchable and provide excerpts was transformative enough that it outweighed the infringement of copyright and potential market impact.

Note: This is a version of my Torment Nexus newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “Judge says AI engines can index books but can’t pirate them”

When one of the coldest cases in Texas got even weirder

From Texas Monthly: “The day before he would take off his clothes and vanish into the rural countryside on a frigid night — defying logic, devastating those who loved him, and baffling some of the best criminal investigators in Texas — Jason Landry was thinking about socks. Not just any socks, but a colorful pair that featured an image of a monkey in a suit and tie holding a briefcase in one hand and a banana in the other, with the words “monkey business” stitched across each ankle. Socks were the highlight of an extensive, bullet-pointed Christmas list that Jason texted to his mother, Lisa, on Saturday, December 12, 2020. Jason, a lovable 21-year-old goofball who always seemed to be smiling, was normally the opposite of a list maker. Unlike his older siblings, both of whom were regimented and rule oriented, Jason eschewed rules and hated planning. In the days before he disappeared, Jason appears to have done lots of self-medicating. In Instagram messages that were later released by law enforcement, Jason told a close friend that with the help of drugs, he’d found God and seen him for the “first time ever.”

A brain implant allowed a man with ALS to speak and even sing musical notes in his real voice

From Scientific American: “A man with a severe speech disability is able to speak expressively and sing using a brain implant that translates his neural activity into words almost instantly. The device conveys changes of tone when he asks questions, emphasizes the words of his choice and allows him to hum a string of notes in three pitches.The system — known as a brain–computer interface (BCI) — used artificial intelligence (AI) to decode the participant’s electrical brain activity as he attempted to speak. The device is the first to reproduce not only a person’s intended words but also features of natural speech such as tone, pitch and emphasis, which help to express meaning and emotion.In a study, a synthetic voice that mimicked the participant’s own spoke his words within 10 milliseconds of the neural activity that signalled his intention to speak. The system, described today in Nature, marks a significant improvement over earlier BCI models, which streamed speech within three seconds.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “When one of the coldest cases in Texas got even weirder”

The poisoning of a Chinese student is still a mystery

From the China Project: “It’s perhaps the most infamous case in the annals of modern Chinese crime. The tale begins in March 1995, as a nervous Zhu walked on stage to begin a Chinese zither recital. Her performance was flawless, if a touch rote. No one in the room, least of all Zhu, had any idea of the reason: that there was a rare poison working through her system, a toxic heavy metal called thallium (ta) that would soon render the young scholar incapable of again recognizing a zither melody again, let alone play one. The first strange signs had begun in November the previous year: Zhu’s palms would tingle and grow numb, symptoms quickly followed by agonizing pains, nausea, and diarrhea. At the time, the student had dismissed them as a winter flu or some form of food poisoning. When the conditions returned only hours after her final recital in March, however, they proved far more extreme and varied: Acute stomach ache, drastic hair loss, leg pains, loss of muscular eye control, partial facial paralysis. Today, Zhu Ling lives, but has the mental age of a six-year-0ld.”

The shark from the movie Jaws is in the public domain and always has been

From Ironic Sans: “Due to a fluke of publishing and copyright law, the Jaws shark is public domain. It’s not the character of the shark that’s public domain – or someone would surely be making a low-budget horror prequel about how he became the Amity Island Killer. But I’m talking about the famous shark painting from the movie poster. When the book first came out, it didn’t have this cover art. An old New York Times article about the book’s origin explains that the author, Peter Benchley, actually had his own idea for the cover. He thought it should show “a peaceful unsuspecting town through the bleached jaws of a shark.” The publisher didn’t like it. They hired artist Roger Kastel to make an updated version of the cover, and he went to the Museum of Natural History to study sharks, and he had a model pose across a couple of stools for reference of what someone looks like swimming. But it was never copyrighted.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “The poisoning of a Chinese student is still a mystery”

Twenty-five years ago today the Globe leaped into the future

I remember it like it was yesterday, even though it was a quarter of a century ago: The day the Globe and Mail newspaper in Toronto flipped the switch (or switches) and a live news website suddenly appeared at globeandmail.com. Imagine — actual news being posted on the internet directly from computers! It was a spectacular thing at the time, real groundbreaking stuff — although as I am writing about it I feel the same way I do when I tell my children that we used to have a dial phone and a party line (ask your grandparents about that last one). The launch was five years after a colleague and I mocked up a website using borrowed HTML and showed it to some of the senior editors at the paper, as an illustration of what we might be able to do if we got on the old information superhighway. The New York Times was getting online, I said, as well as smaller entrepreneurial papers like the News and Observer. There was little to no interest. After all, the internet was a plaything for nerds, not a place where real people did real things!

Not surprisingly, I like to describe this story in a way that makes me seem like a visionary and the Globe like a stodgy stick-in-the-mud (which it was, of course). But in addition to uncertainty about the whole internet thing — and a marked preference for proprietary solutions like Pointcast — there were other business considerations in play as well, as my former boss Ed Greenspon hints at in his LinkedIn post recalling the launch (which was apparently codenamed Rowboat, something I didn’t know until today). At the time, the Globe had a very lucrative deal selling something called InfoGlobe — an old-fashioned text database of news stories — to corporate customers and libraries for huge sums of money, and no one wanted to kill the goose that laid the golden eggs by messing around with some nerdy vision of access for everyone via the Interweb. Also, the Globe was in the midst of a bitter newspaper war with Conrad Black’s National Post, and all the publisher cared about was getting more people reading the paper version.

Somehow, despite all these obstacles, and thanks to the efforts of Ed and Neil Campbell and a host of others, the site went live on this day in 2000. It looks comical now, the height of late 1990s web design (below is a somewhat blurry printout of what it looked like on launch day, courtesy of Kenny Yum), but it was a magical thing. I wrote a launch column in which I said the internet was the best thing to happen to journalism since the typewriter. I believed it at the time, and in some ways I still believe it — even though I have seen in the years since that launch all the myriad ways in which both journalists and non-journalists can foul that nest. But at the time, we knew nothing about Gamergate, or 4chan, or Russia’s Internet Research Agency, or the fact that in the future, people would use the internet primarily to start fights with people from other backgrounds, and to push conspiracy theories about September 11 and the moon landing and how online retailers are shipping children around in furniture as part of a sex trafficking ring run by Hillary Clinton.

Continue reading “Twenty-five years ago today the Globe leaped into the future”

That time I paddled to the US and back

While trying to ignore [gestures vaguely in all directions] my wife and I decided to join her brother and sister-in-law at their campsite at Brown’s Bay near Gananoque, on the St. Lawrence River, home of the so-called Thousand Islands (I’m sure there are far more than a thousand). I’ve seen many of them from the Thousand Islands Bridge, which is a major Canada-US border crossing, but I’ve never spent much time there. And since I try never to go anywhere without my kayak (unless it’s wintertime of course) I decided to head out into the river from Brown’s Bay.

I knew from looking at Google Maps that the Canada-US border was partway across the river, which looked to be about five miles across where we were. Wouldn’t it be funny, I thought, if I paddled across the border and into the US? There were some interesting-looking islands that appeared to be fairly close (about 1.5 miles according to Google), so I paddled up the shore with the intention of paddling down-wind at an angle to get to the islands, since the waves seemed too heavy to risk going across the wind.

About halfway across the deeper part of the river (not the deepest, though, because  the shipping lane that freighters use on the other side of the border is far deeper) I started to wonder whether I had made a mistake. The waves were quite high, with white caps every so often, and I was cutting at such an angle that they washed over me from time to time. And I didn’t have a skirt, so nothing to keep them from swamping the boat (I do know how to do a deep-water self-rescue in a kayak though, so please don’t be alarmed).

Continue reading “That time I paddled to the US and back”

Marc Garneau’s tips on waiting for the shuttle to take off

A Canadian legend passed away this week when former Canadian astronaut and cabinet minister Marc Garneau died at the age of 76, after a battle with not just one type of cancer but two (lymphoma and leukemia), both of which he was diagnosed with earlier this year. He was a former combat engineer in the Canadian Navy and became the first Canadian to go into space in 1984 on the space shuttle Challenger, and after that became the president of the Canadian Space Agency and a mentor to all the Canadian astronauts that followed, including everyone’s favourite singing astronaut, Chris Hadfield. After that he was elected as a member of Parliament and served in a variety of roles for 14 years, including as Transport Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs.

In a previous lifetime, when I was a reporter with the Globe and Mail newspaper in Toronto, I got to spend some time with both Marc Garneau and Chris Hadfield at Kennedy Space Center in Florida in 2005, for what was referred to as the “Return To Flight” mission — the launch of STS-114, the first shuttle to be sent up after a hiatus of more than two years, following the loss of the space shuttle Columbia, which exploded on re-entry in 2003. As part of the 2005 mission, Macdonald Dettweiler — creator of the original Canadarm, or what was officially known as the Shuttle Remote Manipulator System — spent a lot of time and money expanding the arm’s capabilities, adding a sophisticated camera so that it could scan almost the entire exterior of the shuttle, to see if there were any gaps in the tiles or other anomalies that might cause it to explode.

I attended a number of briefings at MDA’s offices in Toronto, at least one of which was given by my Chris Hadfield, who at the time had been up in space twice and was the first Canadian to do a spacewalk. In July of 2005 I flew down to Florida and drove to Cocoa Beach, a tiny surfing town off the coast about 15 kms south of Kennedy Space Center, known for surfing and for being the home of the sexy genie in the TV show I Dream of Jeannie. By sheer coincidence, I wound up staying at what I thought was a nondescript chain motel, but turned out to be a motel that used to be owned by the five original Apollo astronauts. The story I heard (which I never confirmed) was that they used to stay across the street at the Holiday Inn, and then a friend said that if the whole space thing took off they might want their own hotel, so they built one. The only evidence was a small plaque out by the tiny swimming pool.

Continue reading “Marc Garneau’s tips on waiting for the shuttle to take off”

The man who painted every iconic movie poster for the last forty years

I had never heard the name Drew Struzan before, but I certainly know his work — he has painted almost every iconic movie poster I can remember from my misspent youth, including the early Star Wars posters, one for the original Blade Runner, plus posters for everything from Raiders of the Lost Ark and The Goonies to Hook and Hellboy and The Shawshank Redemption. Apparently he is 78 years old and his Alzheimer’s has progressed to the point where he can no longer draw or paint, which is sad.

About his career, Struzan has said: “I was poor and hungry, and illustration was the shortest path to a slice of bread, as compared to a gallery showing. I had nothing as a child. I drew on toilet paper with pencils – that was the only paper around. Probably why I love drawing so much today is because it was just all I had at the time.” In addition to movie posters he would also create album cover artwork for a long line of musical artists, including Tony Orlando and Dawn, The Beach Boys, Bee Gees, Roy Orbison, Black Sabbath, Glenn Miller, Iron Butterfly, Bach, Earth, Wind & Fire, and Liberace.

Struzan once lamented on the decline of traditional art in an e-mail exchange:

I love the texture of paint made of colored earth, of oil from the trees and of canvas and paper. I love the expression of paint from a brush or a hand smearing charcoal, the dripping of paint and moisture of water, the smell of the materials. I delight in the changeable nature of a painting with new morning light or in the afternoon when the sun turns a painting orange or by firelight at night. I love to see it, hold it, touch it, smell it, and create it. My gift is to share my life by allowing others to see into my heart and spirit through such tangible, comprehensible and familiar means. The paint is part of the expression.

Treasure Island: The enduring enigma of Tucker’s Cross

From Mental Floss: “It was 1955, and Tucker, 30, was underwater in Bermuda. He was diving at the site of a shipwreck, which he would later learn to be the 16th-century Spanish ship the San Pedro. On the seventh day, Tucker was tugging on a piece of wood 30 feet below the surface when he made the discovery of a lifetime. The 22-karat cross, barely bigger than the palm of his hand, featured seven green emeralds unharmed by hundreds of years spent in the water. One dealer who got wind of the discovery offered Tucker $25,000 for it, the equivalent of $280,000 today. Another offer came from Clare Boothe Luce, the U.S. ambassador to Italy who held the cross’s Catholic symbolism in high esteem. She told Tucker she was prepared to pay $100,000 for it, or $1.1 million today. But Bermuda acquired Tucker’s cross, and they kept it on public display at the Bermuda Aquarium. In 1975, it was temporarily relocated for a special occasion: a visit from Queen Elizabeth II. Then it suddenly disappeared.”

Do cartoon rabbits eat carrots because Bugs Bunny imitated Clark Gable?

From Snack Stack: “We know that real rabbits aren’t huge fans of carrots. Is our association between animal and vegetable based not on nature but on a cartoon in which Bugs Bunny parodies Clark Gable in “It Happened One Night?” It’s true that wild rabbits aren’t going around digging up carrots just for a treat. They’re content with grass and clover and leaves and maybe the above-ground vegetables in the local gardens. I had to do some fact-checking. Is Bugs Bunny really imitating Clark Gable when he eats carrots? Yes, this checks out. This fact is discussed in the documentary “Bugs Bunny: Superstar,” released in 1975 and narrated by Orson Welles. And what about the idea that Bugs Bunny created the cultural belief that rabbits love carrots? It’s fairly easy to fact-check this. All we have to do is see if “bunnies eat carrots” was a common belief prior to 1940, the year that Bugs made his veggie-chomping debut in “A Wild Hare.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “Treasure Island: The enduring enigma of Tucker’s Cross”

The hunt for the Mad Bomber captivated New York in the ’40s

From NPR: “Beginning in 1940, a man named George Metesky hid 33 pipe bombs in public spaces in New York City. Twenty-two of those bombs exploded, injuring 15 people. Until he was captured in 1957, Metesky was known to the press, the police and an increasingly anxious populace as the “Mad Bomber.” Metesky hid his bombs in phone booths or public restrooms, terrorizing the city in a way that is echoed in today’s terrorism threats. Why did it take so long to catch him? He became very adept at melting into society and kind of cruising under the radar; one of his lawyers referred to him as someone who could pass as your next-door neighbor. In the photos of him, Metesky — under arrest and often surrounded by police officers — grins inexplicably. Those photos graced the cover of newspapers like the Hearst-owned New York Journal-American, whose publisher, Seymour Berkson, played a significant role in the manhunt.”

An English surgeon in the 1700s blinded both Johann Sebastian Bach and Georg Handel

From La Brujula Verde: “Despite being a royal surgeon, John Taylor had a huge failure rate, with hundreds of people who not only failed to heal but were blinded forever. A good example of this could be his two most famous patients. Bach suffered from serious health problems, including a progressive blindness that made his work difficult and practically impossible. Current experts believe that this was due to diabetes, although he also had considerable blepharitis. Taylor was hired to try and fix his vision, operating on him in March 1750 in Leipzig. He considered that it was cataracts, so he opened his eyeball and crushed his lens. Bach did not recover his vision for the rest of his life. Händel also suffered from vision problems in one eye. It was thought to be due to an accident he suffered while travelling by carriage in Holland in the summer of 1750. He underwent a cataract operation performed by Taylor and lost his vision completely.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “The hunt for the Mad Bomber captivated New York in the ’40s”

A Complete Unknown: Pluses and minuses

Watched the Dylan movie last night, and was pleasantly surprised. I was afraid that Timothee Chalamet might phone it in by acting with his puppy-dog eyes, looking up from under his eyebrows all the time — and there is some of that — but I came away mostly impressed. He did a respectable job of playing the young Dylan, surly and moody but also brilliant. And his guitar playing and singing was impressive from someone who didn’t play before he started filming the movie. I knew he could do a good job of that part when I saw him on Saturday Night Live, when he chose to do several little-known Dylan songs — and did them extremely well. The actress who plays Joan Baez also does an incredible job, and I have to give some props to Ed Norton too, who played Pete Seeger to a T and even learned how to play the banjo for the part, which is not an easy thing to do.

Liberties were taken with the script, obviously. Elle Fanning’s character, who is supposed to be Suze Rotolo, never went to the Newport Folk Festival with Dylan on his motorcyle (he wasn’t even riding a motorcycle at that point), and Johnny Cash comes off as a bit of a cartoon. Joan Baez comes off a little nicer than I think she was in real life (I think even Joan would agree with me there) and events are squished together in various ways. The concert scene at Newport where Dylan played electric is played up a lot more than I think it was in real life (although I wasn’t there) — from what I’ve read, Pete Seeger was mostly upset that the sound was terrible, not that it was electric, and some of those who were there said that the crowd booed because the set was too short, not because they were folk purists who didn’t like electric music. Dylan’s electric album was already out and very popular by then.

The movie also leaves out a bunch of people who were instrumental (sorry) in Dylan’s career, like Dave Van Ronk and Ramblin’ Jack Elliott — and Dylan’s first wife, whom he had already married by the end of the time period the movie covers. Anyway, long story short I thought it was pretty good. The only thing that makes me wonder how realistic some of it is is that Dylan was a producer, and had script approval, and apparently even inserted a scene that never happened (although the director refuses to say which one). Dylan has always been the least reliable narrator of his own life, going back to when he buried Robert Zimmerman in Hibbing, Minnesota and invented the character he became in New York. But what a character 🙂 At one point in the movie, Chalamet says that “if anyone is going to hold your attention on stage, you have to kind of be a freak,” and I don’t know if Dylan ever said that, but he’s not wrong.

Always wanted to live in a church in New Orleans?

As a lapsed Catholic, I no longer believe in the religious part of what happens inside Catholic churches, but I still really admire their architecture, so I am a sucker for a renovated church that has been turned into a single-family home, and this one in New Orleans is right up my alley. It’s only $1.25 million, so definitely affordable 🙂 It’s got five bedrooms and five bathrooms, and offers about 5,000 square feet of living space on a 5,800-square-foot lot. It was built in 1917.

Continue reading “Always wanted to live in a church in New Orleans?”

That time I helped write a story for the infamous Weekly World News tabloid

If you are of a certain age (I won’t say how old exactly), you might remember a tabloid newspaper called The Weekly World News — a black-and-white paper featuring huge headlines with multiple exclamation marks about Elvis living on the moon, or a mutant child known only as “Bat-Boy.” It was usually sold in a rack by the cashier in the grocery store, along with its sister paper the National Enquirer, The Sun, and other rags, and before the Internet came along it was the source of an almost infinite number of hilarious and bizarre urban legends and stories, most of which were clearly fake. It also featured a column by a right-wing lunatic known as “Ed Anger,” who hated foreigners, yoga, speed limits and pineapple on pizza and was a big fan of the electric chair and beer.

I loved reading the Weekly World News, and after I started down the path to becoming a journalist, I often joked about ending my career — as some British tabloid veterans apparently did — living in Boca Raton, Florida where the paper was based, and inventing ridiculous stories about aliens, complete with photos and artists renderings. It sounded like a ton of fun. And then, after I had graduated from journalism school and was working at my first job as a reporter for a weekly newsmagazine in Alberta, I wound up helping the editors of the Weekly World News publish a story — and this one was 100-percent real, even though it sounded like something made up.

Continue reading “That time I helped write a story for the infamous Weekly World News tabloid”