Author: Mathew Ingram

From Global News: “A Prince George, B.C., man received a 90-day driving prohibition after he was spotted by police driving an unusual vehicle on a street on Friday morning. On Sept. 5, an officer was on patrol in the area of 15th Avenue and Nicholson Street at 9 a.m. when they spotted a man driving a pink toy car down the street. The toy appeared to be a Power Wheels Barbie Jeep Wrangler. Kasper Lincoln told Global News he’d borrowed the toy, which belongs to his roommate’s daughter, to go get a Slurpee. During the stop, the police officer believed the driver to be impaired and found that the driver had a suspended licence. The driver was arrested for prohibited driving and he then provided two breath samples that were both over the legal limit and was subsequently issued a 90-day driving prohibition, police said. Lincoln said he hadn’t had anything to drink that morning and had just woken up. He added that the Barbie Jeep was not impounded and had been returned to his roommate’s daughter.”

How the math of shuffling cards almost brought down an online poker empire

From Scientific American: “If you’ve ever shuffled a deck of playing cards, you’ve most likely created a unique deck. That is, you’re probably the only person who has ever arranged the cards in precisely that order. Although this claim sounds incredible, it’s a great illustration of how quickly large numbers can creep into everyday situations—with occasionally challenging consequences, as the developers of an online poker game painfully discovered in the late 1990s. The mathematics of card shuffling is quite easy to explain. To calculate how many arrangements 52 playing cards can have, you must go through all the possible shuffles. A standard deck can be arranged in 52 × 51 × 50 × … × 2 × 1 = 52! different ways. If you do the multiplication and round the answer, you will get a number with 67 zeros. That’s more than a quadrillion times as many ways to arrange these cards as there are atoms on Earth.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “He was fined for driving a pink Barbie Jeep while intoxicated”

From History Workshop: “Africans crossed the Atlantic alongside the earliest Europeans, some trafficked in bondage, others navigating precarious forms of freedom. Yet recent scholarship, particularly since the turn of the century, is starting to give voice to the many Africans who have not been studied or considered important historical actors, erased by both colonial records and modern prejudice. Black conquistadors appear in various ship logs, retellings of expeditions, and even in some of the most famous Indigenous testimonies of the conquest – the Nahua codices. Juan Garrido was a firsthand witness to many critical events during the expansion of the Spanish Empire. But the document which makes Garrido so unique is his probanza, used to petition rewards from the king for service to the crown. This outstanding piece of evidence provides an insight into the life of a Black subject of the Spanish Empire.”

How a dead cat led to the Blue Angels aerobatic fighter-jet team getting quieter

From Substack: “This is the story of a heart-wrenching emotional loss needlessly compounded by unapologetic Constitutional violations. When a beloved family member was terrorized by the United States Navy’s Blue Angels, an American citizen exercised her Constitutional right to criticize her government’s role in her daughter’s suffering. In response, a cadre of emotionally fragile snowflakes masquerading as naval officers chose the coward’s path: they silenced this citizen’s speech, violated their oath to the Constitution, and brought disgrace upon the uniform they claim to honor. A year later, when that same vulnerable creature died after enduring yet another sonic assault during her final days on Earth, the Navy’s Constitutional betrayal compounded the tragedy — an American remained silenced, unable to voice her grief or otherwise hold her government accountable for its role in her family’s suffering.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “This Black man was a Spanish conquistador in the 1500s”

From Wikipedia: “Hyraceum is the petrified and rock-like excrement composed of both urine and feces of the rock hyrax and closely related species. The rock hyrax defecates in the same location over generations, which may be sheltered in caves. These locations form middens that are composed of hyraceum and hyrax pellets, which can be petrified and preserved for over 50,000 years. It is also a sought-after material that has been used in both traditional South African medicine and perfumery. The material hardens and ages until it becomes a fairly sterile, rock-like material that contains compounds giving it an animalic, complex fermented scent that combines the elements of  musk, castoreum, civet, tobacco and agarwood. The material is harvested without disturbing the animals by digging strata of the brittle, resinous, irregular, blackish-brown stone; because animals are not harmed in its harvesting, it is often an ethical substitute for deer musk and civet, which require killing or inflicting pain on the animal.”

This Turkish hotel is suspended on metal beams over an archaeological dig

From Amusing Planet: “In 2009, a construction crew digging the foundation for a new hotel in Antakya, Turkey, made an astonishing discovery. They uncovered a vast mosaic dating back to Roman times, along with more than 35,000 artifacts spanning some 2,300 years from at least 13 different civilizations. Construction of the hotel was immediately put on hold, while a six-month excavation took place. Eleven years later, the 200-room Museum Hotel Antakya opened its doors. The hotel’s five floors are suspended on steel columns above the actual archeological site, where the 11,000 square feet Roman mosaic lay in-situ. The hotel’s lowest floor houses an open-air museum with glass floors and walkways providing a view of the mosaic and the various excavation pits. The guest rooms are stacked above this open space, hovering above the site in a stacked honeycomb structure, with glass windows directly overlooking the findings.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “Thousand-year-old poop is a key ingredient in perfume”

A little over a year ago, things looked fairly bleak for Google on the legal front (and on other fronts, but we’ll get to that later). In August of last year, Judge Amit Mehta of the federal court for the District of Columbia handed down a decision in the US government’s antitrust case against the search giant that could not have been more blunt: “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” he ruled. This is the core tenet of modern antitrust law — not just the existence of a monopoly, but the employment of illegal methods in order to maintain that monopoly. In particular, Mehta ruled that the payments Google makes to Apple and other companies in return for being the default search engine in their browsers and on their devices — payments that totaled more than $20 billion dollars last year — were an unfair restraint on competition. So a slam-dunk decision in favor of competition, right? Google has to be broken up, has to sell off Chrome, has to stop paying Apple and others billions, etc. etc. Right? Well, no.

The judge’s definitive ruling certainly convinced some people that all of these remedies were both necessary and likely to occur, including Tim Wu — the Columbia Law professor (and former special assistant to Obama on competition policy) who came up with the term “net neutrality” back in the day. Wu wrote a piece for the New York Times that sounded like he was dancing on Google’s grave, and that the remedies listed above — selling off Chrome, dismantling the company’s search business, etc. — were almost a fait accompli (although he hedged his bets). But as it turns out, Mehta has done virtually none of those things in his decision on remedies, which came out late Tuesday. No forced sell-off of Chrome or Android. No end to the billion-dollar payments to Apple and others for search. No requirement to share real-time search-index data with competitors (although some sharing is required). Here’s how Bloomberg described it:

Alphabet Inc.’s Google will be required to share online search data with rivals while avoiding harsher penalties, including the forced sale of its Chrome business, a judge ruled in the biggest US antitrust case in almost three decades. Tuesday’s ruling represents a blow to the government, falling far short of the most severe remedies sought by antitrust enforcers after the court found Google illegally monopolized the search market. Judge Amit Mehta said he will bar Google from entering into exclusive contracts for distribution but would still allow the search giant to pay its partners — a key win for Apple Inc., which has received roughly $20 billion a year for making Google search the default on iPhones. The finding follows the Washington, DC, judge’s ruling last year that Google illegally monopolized the markets for online search and search advertising. Mehta held a three-week hearing in April to determine a fix.

Note: This is a version of my Torment Nexus newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “The Google antitrust decision isn’t popular but it’s the right one”

From Boing Boing: “For the first fourteen years of his life, Viraj Dhanda, who has autism and apraxia (a neurological condition that limits muscle movements and motor skills), was non-verbal, non-communicative, and assumed to be intellectually disabled. He was diagnosed with autism at age 2. It wasn’t until his father, Sumit, experimented with various communication and keyboard devices that Viraj could work with one part of his body with which he had sufficient dexterity — his right thumb — that he discovered that his son was far from intellectually disabled. He was brilliant. In less than three years, Viraj went from learning basic math to calculus. “I hated being labeled mentally disabled. People thought I was behavioral because I flopped on the floor, used my body to communicate, but what was I supposed to do?” Viraj Dhanda said. “I was desperate for the world to know that I had a fully functional brain.”

In the early 2000s a superhero named Shadow Hare fought crime in Cincinnati

From Wikipedia: “Shadow Hare (or Shadowhare) is the pseudonym of a vigilante superhero who operated in Cincinnati, Ohio from 2005-2010. He stated that he lived in Milford, Ohio. Wearing a handmade black suit with a stylized hare on the front, along with a cape and mask, he patrolled the streets looking for crimes in progress, and gave out meals to the homeless. Although not supported or endorsed by the Cincinnati Police Department, he cooperated with police, making citizen’s arrests when necessary. Shadow Hare claimed to be skilled in Shōrin-ryū and mixed martial arts, and carried mace, a taser, and handcuffs. He once received a dislocated shoulder while assisting a woman who was being robbed. He frequented Cincinnati public events, using his tagline “I see the shadows of shadows.” He received a fair amount of international internet and television news coverage, ranging from supportive to mocking.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “He didn’t speak for 14 years and just got admitted to MIT”

From Boing Boing: “For the first fourteen years of his life, Viraj Dhanda, who has autism and apraxia (a neurological condition that limits muscle movements and motor skills), was non-verbal, non-communicative, and assumed to be intellectually disabled. He was diagnosed with autism at age 2. It wasn’t until his father, Sumit, experimented with various communication and keyboard devices that Viraj could work with one part of his body with which he had sufficient dexterity — his right thumb — that he discovered that his son was far from intellectually disabled. He was brilliant. In less than three years, Viraj went from learning basic math to calculus. “I hated being labeled mentally disabled. People thought I was behavioral because I flopped on the floor, used my body to communicate, but what was I supposed to do?” Viraj Dhanda said. “I was desperate for the world to know that I had a fully functional brain.”

In the early 2000s a superhero named Shadow Hare fought crime in Cincinnati

From Wikipedia: “Shadow Hare (or Shadowhare) is the pseudonym of a vigilante superhero who operated in Cincinnati, Ohio from 2005-2010. He stated that he lived in Milford, Ohio. Wearing a handmade black suit with a stylized hare on the front, along with a cape and mask, he patrolled the streets looking for crimes in progress, and gave out meals to the homeless. Although not supported or endorsed by the Cincinnati Police Department, he cooperated with police, making citizen’s arrests when necessary. Shadow Hare claimed to be skilled in Shōrin-ryū and mixed martial arts, and carried mace, a taser, and handcuffs. He once received a dislocated shoulder while assisting a woman who was being robbed. He frequented Cincinnati public events, using his tagline “I see the shadows of shadows.” He received a fair amount of international internet and television news coverage, ranging from supportive to mocking.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “He didn’t speak for 14 years and just got admitted to MIT”

A little over a year ago, things looked fairly bleak for Google on the legal front (and on other fronts, but we’ll get to that later). In August of last year, Judge Amit Mehta of the federal court for the District of Columbia handed down a decision in the US government’s antitrust case against the search giant that could not have been more blunt: “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” he ruled. This is the core tenet of modern antitrust law — not just the existence of a monopoly, but the employment of illegal methods in order to maintain that monopoly. In particular, Mehta ruled that the payments Google makes to Apple and other companies in return for being the default search engine in their browsers and on their devices — payments that totaled more than $20 billion dollars last year — were an unfair restraint on competition. So a slam-dunk decision in favor of competition, right? Google has to be broken up, has to sell off Chrome, has to stop paying Apple and others billions, etc. etc. Right? Well, no.

The judge’s definitive ruling certainly convinced some people that all of these remedies were both necessary and likely to occur, including Tim Wu — the Columbia Law professor (and former special assistant to Obama on competition policy) who came up with the term “net neutrality” back in the day. Wu wrote a piece for the New York Times that sounded like he was dancing on Google’s grave, and that the remedies listed above — selling off Chrome, dismantling the company’s search business, etc. — were almost a fait accompli (although he hedged his bets). But as it turns out, Mehta has done virtually none of those things in his decision on remedies, which came out late Tuesday. No forced sell-off of Chrome or Android. No end to the billion-dollar payments to Apple and others for search. No requirement to share real-time search-index data with competitors (although some sharing is required). Here’s how Bloomberg described it:

Alphabet Inc.’s Google will be required to share online search data with rivals while avoiding harsher penalties, including the forced sale of its Chrome business, a judge ruled in the biggest US antitrust case in almost three decades. Tuesday’s ruling represents a blow to the government, falling far short of the most severe remedies sought by antitrust enforcers after the court found Google illegally monopolized the search market. Judge Amit Mehta said he will bar Google from entering into exclusive contracts for distribution but would still allow the search giant to pay its partners — a key win for Apple Inc., which has received roughly $20 billion a year for making Google search the default on iPhones. The finding follows the Washington, DC, judge’s ruling last year that Google illegally monopolized the markets for online search and search advertising. Mehta held a three-week hearing in April to determine a fix.

Note: This is a version of my Torment Nexus newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “The Google antitrust decision isn’t popular but it’s the right one”