That time I helped write a story for the infamous Weekly World News tabloid

If you are of a certain age (I won’t say how old exactly), you might remember a tabloid newspaper called The Weekly World News — a black-and-white paper featuring huge headlines with multiple exclamation marks about Elvis living on the moon, or a mutant child known only as “Bat-Boy.” It was usually sold in a rack by the cashier in the grocery store, along with its sister paper the National Enquirer, The Sun, and other rags, and before the Internet came along it was the source of an almost infinite number of hilarious and bizarre urban legends and stories, most of which were clearly fake. It also featured a column by a right-wing lunatic known as “Ed Anger,” who hated foreigners, yoga, speed limits and pineapple on pizza and was a big fan of the electric chair and beer.

I loved reading the Weekly World News, and after I started down the path to becoming a journalist, I often joked about ending my career — as some British tabloid veterans apparently did — living in Boca Raton, Florida where the paper was based, and inventing ridiculous stories about alien, complete with photos and artists renderings. It sounded like a ton of fun. And then, after I had graduated from journalism school and was working at my first job as a reporter for a weekly newsmagazine in Alberta, I wound up helping the editors of the Weekly World News publish a story — and this one was 100-percent real, even though it sounded like something made up.

Continue reading “That time I helped write a story for the infamous Weekly World News tabloid”

Did Meriwether Clark commit suicide or was he murdered?

From Scientific American: “Captain Meriwether Lewis — William Clark’s expedition partner on the Corps of Discovery’s historic trek to the Pacific, Thomas Jefferson’s confidante, governor of the Upper Louisiana Territory and all-around American hero — was only 35 when he died of gunshot wounds sustained along a perilous Tennessee trail called Natchez Trace. A broken column, symbol of a life cut short, marks his grave. But exactly what transpired at a remote inn 200 years ago this Saturday? Most historians agree that he committed suicide; others are convinced he was murdered. Even now, precious little is known about the events of October 10, 1809, after Lewis – armed with several pistols, a rifle and a tomahawk – stopped at a log cabin lodging house known as Grinder’s Stand. He and Clark had finished their expedition three years earlier.”

This town in Manitoba is the only place that has a prison for polar bears

From Now I Know: “Churchill is home to about 800 to 1,000 people, and, for about six to eight weeks in the late fall, also to a similar number of polar bears. Including the handful that are locked up in Churchill’s polar bear prison. Polar bears subsist on a high-fat, high-protein diet consisting mainly of ringed seals. Each year, hundreds of polar bears make their way to the Churchill area in search of food – the Bay is home to many ringed seals – and when seals are hard to find, the bears go searching for food elsewhere. Often, this means there’s a polar bear or two walking around town. In response, Manitoba has a group of “conservation officers” who are charged with keeping bears (not people) in check and, similarly, to protect the bear population. Call 675-BEAR and the six officers (or some subset of them) will be on-scene as soon as possible.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “Did Meriwether Clark commit suicide or was he murdered?”

Waiters in France went on strike for the right to grow mustaches

From Atlas Obscura: “It’s April 1907. You’re an American in Paris, searching for a taste of real culture. You settle down in a quaint café, but before you can choose a police officer approaches and asks you—not exactly politely—to leave. You stagger off, confused and hungry. Around the city at that time, high-end waiters were on strike to demand better pay, more time off—and the right to grow mustaches. The bristly adornments had been virtually ubiquitous among French men for decades, though many waiters, domestic servants, and priests were not allowed to have them—“sentenced to forced shaving,” as the newspaper La Lanterne put it. Indignant waiters walked out of their fancy restaurants en masse, along with roughly 25,000 francs a day in revenue.”

The deepest hotel in the world is 1,400 feet underground in a former slate mine

From Architectural Digest: “Hard hats, flashlights, and hiking boots aren’t the type of toiletries one is used to receiving at their overnight accommodations, but visiting the world’s deepest hotel isn’t your usual retreat. Known as the Deep Sleep, the property is located in Snowdonia, Wales, at the base of an abandoned slate mine. The vacation experience is among the most evident tangible examples of the old maxim, the journey is more important than the destination. When guests arrive, they’re given all the equipment necessary to travel to their cabins, which are roughly 1,400-feet underground. The trip is operated by the mine exploration company Go Below Underground Adventure. A guide leads them through the massive pit, which goes for miles in a series of maze-like tunnels created by miners over 200 years. To get to the bottom, visitors climb through caverns, journey through tunnels, and even zip line at times.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “Waiters in France went on strike for the right to grow mustaches”

The TikTok saga has gotten even stupider if that’s possible

This week could see the end of the TikTok saga, and if it does — regardless of what the ending is — I for one will be grateful if that happens. As faithful readers of The Torment Nexus (like you) will no doubt remember, I wrote in September that the crusade against TikTok was a “ridiculous waste of time” and I stand by that position. If anything, in fact, I feel it even more strongly now, given some of the rhetoric that we’ve seen published about the looming ban — including some of the commentary from the Supreme Court, who are supposed to be omniscient and wise in all things, but are really just people with flawed opinions and political concerns like everyone else (and some of those political concerns are more obvious than others, as we’ve recently learned about Justice Alito).

The Supremes ruled this week on TikTok’s appeal of the law that was passed last April, which requires owner Bytedance to either sell the app to a non-Chinese owner or face a ban in the US. According to some reports based on the questions and commentary from the court, the justices appeared to be leaning towards rejecting the appeal on national security grounds, and and on Friday they confirmed that by upholding the law. Anonymous sources also told Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal that China was considering selling the app to Elon Musk, which would definitely be the fastest way to destroy TikTok . Bytedance said that if it loses its court challenge, it is planning to shut the app down completely rather than allow existing users to keep using it, which feels like a PR exercise. And Trump is trying to come up with ways to save it.

Setting aside all of this sturm und drang, let’s talk about what’s at the root of it: Are people seriously arguing that an app where people watch short video clips of girls dancing or cats riding Roomba vacuums is somehow a threat to the national security of the United States? Yes, they sure are. And is this argument just as ridiculous as it was the last time I wrote about it? Yes, it sure is.

Note: This is a version of my Torment Nexus newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “The TikTok saga has gotten even stupider if that’s possible”

Wallace Tillinghast and the New England airship hoax of 1909

From Creative Histories: “The New York Times stated that a “mysterious craft made its appearance over the city about 6:45 o’clock tonight, sailed about in circles and was seen by more than 1500 people…during much of the time the airship was near the city the aviator was sweeping the earth and skies with a powerful searchlight.” What would become known to history as The Great New England Airship Hoax of 1909 began on that cold December night in the relatively small city of Worcester, Massachusetts. Before it ended, hundreds of thousands of people – including many celebrities such as famed novelist H.P. Lovecraft – all over the northeastern United States would claim to have seen the strange lights and large flying craft, which were dubbed “airships” at the time, flying over their heads in the nighttime sky from Maine all the way to New Jersey.”

It’s one of the most valuable machines in the world and it depends on this woman

From the Wall Street Journal: “When she reports for her shift at a chip plant, Hall slips into a bunny suit. She enters a room where the pristine air is 100 times cleaner than a hospital operating room’s. Then she makes her way over to an unfathomably complex machine. The piece of equipment that the entire world has come to rely on—and she is specially trained to handle—is called an extreme ultraviolet lithography machine. It’s the machine that produces the most advanced microchips on the planet. Even today, there are only a few hundred of these EUV machines in existence—and they are ludicrously expensive. The one that Hall maintains cost $170 million, while the latest models sell for roughly $370 million. It’s a process that involves vaporizing droplets of molten tin and producing light that doesn’t occur naturally on Earth.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “Wallace Tillinghast and the New England airship hoax of 1909”

They killed dozens of people but their identities remain a mystery

From Wikipedia: “The Brabant killers are a group of unidentified criminals responsible for a series of violent attacks that occurred in Belgium between 1982 and 1985. A total of 28 people died and 22 were injured. The actions of the gang, believed to consist of a core of three men, made it Belgium’s most notorious unsolved crime spree. The active participants were known as The Giant (a tall man who may have been the leader); the Killer (Le Tueur; the main shooter) and the Old Man (Le Vieux; a middle aged man who drove). The gang abruptly ceased their activities in 1985. The ensuing chaotic investigation failed to catch them or even make serious inroads into solving the case. This led to a parliamentary inquiry and public discussion, both of which revolved around the possibility that the gang members were Belgian or foreign state security elements. The case was officially closed on 28 June 2024.”

For over 500 years Oxford graduates had to swear an oath against one specific person

From The Bodleian Library: “In 1827, Oxford University undertook a major review of its statutes. The statutes were, and still are, the written set of rules and regulations which governed everything that went on in the University. A product of many centuries, some of these were over already 500 years old by 1827. In going through the statutes as part of this review, the University found something rather odd in the section relating to Bachelors of Arts and the oaths they had to swear in order to become a Master of Arts. As well as being required to swear that they would observe the University’s statutes, privileges, liberties and customs, as you might expect; and not to lecture elsewhere, or resume their bachelor studies after getting their MA, the Bachelors of Arts also had to swear that they would never agree to the reconciliation of Henry Symeonis.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “They killed dozens of people but their identities remain a mystery”

The hot new party drug is blueberry-flavored nitrous oxide

From New York: “In early 2023, Alex took a job at Cloud 9, a strip-mall smoke shop off Atlanta’s I-85. He had recently graduated from college and wanted something laid-back; the shop, with its graffitied ceilings and cheesy blue-light displays, seemed like the ideal register job for a stoner with a music degree.It didn’t take long for him to realize that many of his customers weren’t there for rolling papers or vapes. They were coming instead for Galaxy Gas, the shop’s toddler-size, candy-flavored, Day-Glo–colored tanks of nitrous oxide. He didn’t know anything about nitrous when he started, but his manager walked him through the basics. Soon, he understood exactly what nitrous oxide was. How could he not? His customers were buying hundreds of dollars worth of tanks at a time, inhaling as much as they could in the parking lot of the store, then coming back for more, often with strange new limps and tremors.”

It’s an Andy Warhol lottery except you never know whether you won

From Now I Know: “In 2021, an group called MSCHF bought Andy Warhol’s sketch “Fairies” for $20,000. That October, they sold it at a huge profit of $250,000 — if you include the 999 fake copies they also sold that month. MSCHF is a Brooklyn, NY-based art collective known for its creative destruction. In April 2020, they purchased a painting of 88 dots by artist Damien Hirst for $30,000, then hand cut each of the dots out of the canvas. MSCHF sold each of the dots for $480, making a small profit, and then sold the spotless canvas (now titled “88 Holes”) for an additional $261,400. The Warhol “Fairies” effort was more of the same. The group purchased an authentic 1954 Warhol pen drawing, then used digital technology and a robotic arm to recreate the artist’s exact strokes, before using heat, light and humidity to artificially age the paper.” Then they destroyed any evidence of which of the 1,000 was the real Warhol.” 

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “The hot new party drug is blueberry-flavored nitrous oxide”

A 7-year-old boy survived for five days in a wild game park

From the BBC: “A young boy was found alive after surviving five days in a game park inhabited by lions and elephants in northern Zimbabwe, according to a member of parliament in that country. The ordeal began when Tinotenda Pudu wandered at least 23 km (14 miles) from home into the “perilous” Matusadona Game Park, said Mashonaland West MP Mutsa Murombedzi. He spent five days “sleeping on a rocky perch, amidst roaring lions, passing elephants, eating wild fruits”, she said. Matusadona game park has about 40 lions. The Zimbabwe Parks & Wildlife Management Authority confirmed the incident to the BBC but said the boy walked 49 km (30 miles) from home. Murombedzi said the boy used his knowledge of the wild and survival skills to stay alive.”

There are unexploded rocket-launched grenades on the moon

From Standing Well Back: “It may seem bizarre, but rocket propelled Ggenades were taken to the moon on a couple of the Apollo missions to the moon in the 1970s. Three were fired, and five were abandoned.  So there is an interesting EOD task outstanding on someone’s operational docket for a future mission. One of the ambitions of the Apollo project was to understand the geology of the Moon. Accordingly, a number of passive and active seismic experiments were planned. For one, a number of rocket propelled explosive devices containing varying amounts of explosives were used, and the launch initiation was radio-controlled, with the impact causing the detonation when they struck the moon. In much of the documentation the system is called a mortar but elsewhere the charges are referred to as rocket propelled charges or grenades.”

Note: This is a version of my When The Going Gets Weird newsletter, which I send out via Ghost, the open-source publishing platform. You can see other issues and sign up here.

Continue reading “A 7-year-old boy survived for five days in a wild game park”

Net neutrality is dead again and journalism could suffer

Net neutrality—or the idea that all digital information should flow through the internet unencumbered by restrictions and without internet companies showing favoritism toward some types and sources of content over others—sometimes feels like an immutable law of the modern world; like gravity or magnetic attraction. But in reality, it’s a political football that has been tossed back and forth for decades between open-internet advocates and free-market conservatives, who feel that neutrality rules are unnecessary and a brake on innovation and growth. Last week, the opponents of net neutrality won a significant victory when judges on the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission didn’t have the right to impose such rules when it did so last year. Now critics say that the death of the rules could allow the internet to become distorted by partisan political and corporate interests. It could also make existing online even more difficult for news publishers and journalism in general.

Net neutrality first appeared as a concept in a paper written by Tim Wu—then an associate professor at the University of Virginia; now a Columbia University law professor—in 2003, published in the Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law. In the paper, Wu foresaw that “communications regulators over the next decade will spend increasing time on conflicts between the private interests of broadband providers and the public’s interest in a competitive innovation environment centered on the Internet”—a prediction that was spot on. The idea of net neutrality, Wu wrote, is no different than promoting fair competition in any industry, ensuring that “the short term interests of the owner do not prevent the best products or applications becoming available to end-users” and preserving “a Darwinian competition among every conceivable use of the Internet so that the only the best survive.”

This idea helped shape FCC rules, in 2004, that aimed at what the commission called “preserving internet freedom,” including a user’s right to choose any device they wanted to connect to an internet network, the applications they wanted to run, and the content they wanted to consume. In 2008, the FCC took action against Comcast for throttling the internet speed of cable customers who used a file-sharing system called BitTorrent, which Comcast didn’t like because it sucked up too much bandwidth. (Comcast paid a fine but did not admit any wrongdoing.) In 2014, the FCC issued an Open Internet Order that prohibited telecom and broadband companies from blocking their customers’ access to competing services or websites. The following year, the commission officially defined internet service providers (or ISPs) as “Title II” carriers, similar to phone or other utility providers, giving the agency control over their activities under the Telecommunications Act.

Note: This was originally published as the daily newsletter for the Columbia Journalism Review, where I was the chief digital writer

Continue reading “Net neutrality is dead again and journalism could suffer”