{"id":928,"date":"2007-01-26T11:46:28","date_gmt":"2007-01-26T16:46:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/01\/26\/a-wikipedia-dedicated-to-shopping\/"},"modified":"2007-01-26T11:46:28","modified_gmt":"2007-01-26T16:46:28","slug":"a-wikipedia-dedicated-to-shopping","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/01\/26\/a-wikipedia-dedicated-to-shopping\/","title":{"rendered":"A Wikipedia dedicated to shopping"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Although it often gets dismissed as a boring, Web 1.0 retailer at heart, Amazon has been doing a lot more innovative things than it gets credit for &#8212; including its very Web 2.0-ish S3 <a href=\"http:\/\/aws.amazon.com\/s3\">distributed storage service<\/a> (which more startups should make use of) and its EC2 virtual server offering. And now, Amazon has jumped into the wiki business as well, with the &#8220;Amapedia,&#8221; a wiki devoted to products, which was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cadenhead.org\/workbench\/news\/3112\/amapedia-conspicuous-consumption\">discovered by<\/a> the resourceful Rogers Cadenhead.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s still so new that there&#8217;s very little content in the Amapedia, but it has a very clean interface &#8212; arguably even cleaner and easier to follow than Wikipedia&#8217;s. There&#8217;s a featured product on <a href=\"http:\/\/amapedia.amazon.com\">the landing page<\/a>, and then a big &#8220;tag cloud&#8221; of keywords. When you click on something like &#8220;camera,&#8221; you get taken to a main page with a description of the product, and on the left-hand side there is a breakdown of the cameras in various sub-categories.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/amapedia.amazon.com\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"left\" id=\"image929\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/amapedia.jpg?w=525\" border=\"0\" alt=\"amapedia.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Obviously, there are going to be issues with something like Amapedia, as there are with Wikipedia, which has been involved in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/07\/09\/yet-another-wikipedia-death-notice\/\">all sorts of<\/a> scandals that have to do with accuracy, vandalism, and accusations of elitism. As a small example, the Amapedia entry for camera says the word  is &#8220;Italian for room.&#8221; Close, but no cigar. Camera is actually Latin for room, although Italian is derived from Latin. <\/p>\n<p>With the Microsoft\/Wikipedia kerfuffle so fresh, I wonder how long before companies start paying people to make entries in Amapedia (I give it about a month). The new service is apparently an expansion of the &#8220;product wikis&#8221; that Amazon launched awhile back, and the info from them has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.readwriteweb.com\/archives\/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php\">already been incorporated<\/a> into Amapedia, according to Read\/Write Web.<\/p>\n<p>Rogers Cadenhead, meanwhile &#8212; who says that in honour of having discovered Amapedia first, he should be made king of this new fiefdom and addressed as &#8220;Amazimbo&#8221; &#8212; wonders whether Amazon will compensate those who contribute the most to its entries, with a discount coupon or some variation thereon. Not a bad idea. And does it matter that a product-oriented wiki <a href=\"http:\/\/www.productwiki.com\/\">already exists<\/a>?<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Although it often gets dismissed as a boring, Web 1.0 retailer at heart, Amazon has been doing a lot more innovative things than it gets credit for &#8212; including its very Web 2.0-ish S3 distributed storage service (which more startups should make use of) and its EC2 virtual server offering. And now, Amazon has jumped &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/01\/26\/a-wikipedia-dedicated-to-shopping\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;A Wikipedia dedicated to shopping&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}