{"id":841,"date":"2006-12-17T11:29:29","date_gmt":"2006-12-17T16:29:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/12\/17\/yes-but-a-smaller-less-frothy-bubble\/"},"modified":"2006-12-17T11:29:29","modified_gmt":"2006-12-17T16:29:29","slug":"yes-but-a-smaller-less-frothy-bubble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/12\/17\/yes-but-a-smaller-less-frothy-bubble\/","title":{"rendered":"Yes &#8212; but a smaller, less frothy bubble"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bubble-ology has become a more popular topic than ever now that Time magazine <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1569514,00.html\">has named<\/a> You as its annual Person of the Year (no, not you specifically, but the collective you &#8212; or us; oh never mind). In fact, there&#8217;s quite a bubblicious debate going on between my friend Paul Kedrosky and Josh Quittner of Business 2.0.<\/p>\n<p>Josh wrote <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1570705,00.html\">a piece<\/a> for Time that boils down to the old &#8220;it&#8217;s different this time&#8221; argument. Yes, it&#8217;s kind of bubble-rific out there, but it&#8217;s okay because it&#8217;s different. As Paul notes, the most ominous words in the investment business are &#8220;it&#8217;s different this time&#8221; &#8212; words which are usually a prelude to all the same mistakes being made, but with different names and by different people.<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" id=\"image842\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/12\/blowing-bubbles.jpg?w=525\" alt=\"blowing-bubbles.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Paul <a href=\"http:\/\/paul.kedrosky.com\/archives\/2006\/12\/16\/web_boom_20_is.html\">counters that<\/a>, if anything, this bubble is actually <i>worse<\/i> than the first one, because <em>&#8220;it&#8217;s cheaper this time to get yourself in just as deep &#8212; and this time there is no IPO market to bail you out.&#8221;<\/em> And he is right &#8212; but then Paul is also the one who told our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.meshconference.com\">mesh conference<\/a> back in May that as a venture capitalist, he is a big fan of bubbles because they speed up the pace of development, and that it &#8220;takes a lot of dead bodies to fill a swamp.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In the end, the debate over where we are on the bubble-ometer comes down to a debate over what was wrong with the first bubble. Was it that entrepreneurs got taken advantage of by venture capitalists eager for a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/technology\/content\/feb2006\/tc20060209_519496.htm\">big-dollar IPO exit<\/a>? Or was it that the combination of those two factors wasted billions of dollars of investors&#8217; money? If you think that VCs and Wall Street brokers were to blame (as I do), then the lack of IPOs is probably a good thing. <\/p>\n<p>Then the only ones losing money (assuming they are losing) are big companies like Google and <a href=\"http:\/\/news.com.com\/eBay+to+nab+Skype+for+2.6+billion\/2100-1030_3-5860055.html\">eBay<\/a>. Does the current bubble make it easier for entrepreneurs to get in over their heads? Sure it does. But I don&#8217;t think they can get as far in, because there isn&#8217;t as much incentive, and because it&#8217;s a whole lot cheaper to scale up to acquisition size than it was before.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bubble-ology has become a more popular topic than ever now that Time magazine has named You as its annual Person of the Year (no, not you specifically, but the collective you &#8212; or us; oh never mind). In fact, there&#8217;s quite a bubblicious debate going on between my friend Paul Kedrosky and Josh Quittner of &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/12\/17\/yes-but-a-smaller-less-frothy-bubble\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Yes &#8212; but a smaller, less frothy bubble&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/841\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}