{"id":669,"date":"2006-11-03T20:57:19","date_gmt":"2006-11-04T00:57:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/11\/03\/hey-who-you-callin-frantic\/"},"modified":"2006-11-03T20:57:19","modified_gmt":"2006-11-04T00:57:19","slug":"hey-who-you-callin-frantic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/11\/03\/hey-who-you-callin-frantic\/","title":{"rendered":"Hey &#8212; who you callin&#8217; frantic?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>frantic: (adj.) excessively agitated; transported with rage or other violent emotion<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Like <a href=\"http:\/\/paul.kedrosky.com\/archives\/2006\/11\/02\/ft_says_google.html\">my friend<\/a> Paul Kedrosky, I find myself somewhat bemused by the recent story from the Financial Times, in which Google is described as being engaged in a &#8220;frantic&#8221; round of negotiations with content providers for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0cf8ea76-6aa2-11db-83d9-0000779e2340.html\">licensing rights<\/a>. Paul notes that in another story, Google&#8217;s quest is described as a &#8220;slog,&#8221; which leads him to wonder whether it&#8217;s even possible to be in a frantic slog (and then to suggest that &#8220;frantic slog&#8221; would be a great <a href=\"http:\/\/paul.kedrosky.com\/archives\/2006\/11\/03\/gootube_media_r.html\">band name<\/a>, which it definitely would).<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/11\/frantic.jpg?w=525\" alt=\"frantic\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is one of those cases where the choice of a single word can twist the perception of a story almost irrevocably, especially when it appears in the lead paragraph. The folks at the pink paper, as some Brits calls it, aren&#8217;t normally known for cranking up the rhetoric the way some of the tabloids do, but I think this time they let their enthusiasm get the better of them. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0cf8ea76-6aa2-11db-83d9-0000779e2340.html\">rest of the story<\/a> is a relatively straight-forward look at what Google is trying to do, but the word &#8220;frantic&#8221; is all out of proportion and that ultimately hurts the story.<\/p>\n<p>As the ever-perceptive Cynthia Brumfield <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipdemocracy.com\/archives\/2006\/11\/03\/#002099\">notes<\/a> at IPDemocracy, sometimes it&#8217;s just more exciting to think of a gigantic multibillion-dollar behemoth like Google getting &#8220;frantic&#8221; about something, or facing a &#8220;potentially crippling&#8221; round of lawsuits, in the same way that financial reporters like to talk about an earnings &#8220;bloodbath&#8221; or how a company is &#8220;hemorrhaging&#8221; money. It makes it sound more interesting. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s also hyperbole.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>frantic: (adj.) excessively agitated; transported with rage or other violent emotion Like my friend Paul Kedrosky, I find myself somewhat bemused by the recent story from the Financial Times, in which Google is described as being engaged in a &#8220;frantic&#8221; round of negotiations with content providers for licensing rights. Paul notes that in another story, &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/11\/03\/hey-who-you-callin-frantic\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Hey &#8212; who you callin&#8217; frantic?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}