{"id":628,"date":"2006-10-25T21:50:10","date_gmt":"2006-10-26T01:50:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/10\/25\/getty-needs-to-cannibalize-itself\/"},"modified":"2006-10-25T21:50:10","modified_gmt":"2006-10-26T01:50:10","slug":"getty-needs-to-cannibalize-itself","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/10\/25\/getty-needs-to-cannibalize-itself\/","title":{"rendered":"Getty needs to cannibalize itself"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I was interested in the stuff that <a href=\"http:\/\/scobleizer.wordpress.com\/2006\/10\/25\/getty-images-a-photo-business-under-pressure\/\">Robert Scoble<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thomashawk.com\/2006\/10\/spending-day-with-getty-images-largest.html\">Thomas Hawk<\/a> have posted about meeting with Getty Images, the giant stock photography company, but not necessarily because I&#8217;m all that interested in photography (although I am). The interesting thing for me is how Getty &#8212; like a lot of other companies in different industries &#8212; is trying to find a way of transitioning its business from one model to another, effectively cannibalizing itself before others can do it.<\/p>\n<p>Scoble mentions how people such as Thomas (or whatever his real name is) and services such as Flickr and Zooomr are a threat to Getty, and they are &#8212; although not so immediate a threat that you can draw a direct line between the disappointing <a href=\"http:\/\/seattlepi.nwsource.com\/business\/289848_gettyearns25.html\">financial results<\/a> the company reported and the rise of consumer photo-sharing sites. And Getty essentially tried to build a bridge between its old business and a new one by acquiring Calgary-based iStockphoto, one of the largest Web-based stock photo services out there (it recently added video as well).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/creative.gettyimages.com\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/10\/getty%20imags.JPG?w=525\" alt=\"getty images\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Getty&#8217;s business, like that of competitor Corbis (owned by Bill Gates) consists mostly of high-quality, hard-to-come-by photos of celebrities and events, used in glossy, high-quality magazines, and for those the company gets paid anywhere from hundreds to thousands of dollars, depending on use. iStockphoto.com, by contrast, sells photos for as little as $1. And it does big business with small and medium-sized publications, Web sites and so on, with photos for $10 or $50 or $100.<\/p>\n<p>In effect, Getty is hoping that owning iStockphoto can expand its business rapidly enough that it can counterbalance the decline in those hundred or thousand-dollar photo jobs, and prevent the recent financial pressure from becoming a sustained downturn. Other companies will have to find ways of doing the same in their industries, as James Robertson <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cincomsmalltalk.com\/blog\/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3339241821\">points out<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was interested in the stuff that Robert Scoble and Thomas Hawk have posted about meeting with Getty Images, the giant stock photography company, but not necessarily because I&#8217;m all that interested in photography (although I am). The interesting thing for me is how Getty &#8212; like a lot of other companies in different industries &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/10\/25\/getty-needs-to-cannibalize-itself\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Getty needs to cannibalize itself&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/628\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}