{"id":4302,"date":"2009-02-19T10:44:07","date_gmt":"2009-02-19T14:44:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=4302"},"modified":"2009-02-19T10:44:07","modified_gmt":"2009-02-19T14:44:07","slug":"the-micropayment-debate-continues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2009\/02\/19\/the-micropayment-debate-continues\/","title":{"rendered":"The micropayment debate continues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Is it possible to be fascinated by an issue and yet tired of it at the same time? If so, then micropayments for online news pretty much fits that bill for me. I know that it&#8217;s a crucial time for the newspaper business (which pays my salary), and I know that many thoughtful and intelligent people believe that micropayments are the answer to the industry&#8217;s woes &#8212; including former news executive Alan Mutter, who blogs at Reflections of a Newsosaur, and whose recent argument about paying for things I took on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.niemanlab.org\/2009\/02\/alan-mutters-question-backfires\/\">in this post<\/a>. But there has been an awful lot of talk about the issue over the past few weeks and months, including some excellent pieces by Clay Shirky and others (I&#8217;ve collected a list of the major ones at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2009\/02\/10\/paying-for-the-news-a-link-a-thon\/\">my personal blog<\/a> if you&#8217;re interested).<\/p>\n<p>And still the debate continues. The Freakonomics blog at the New York Times is the latest to <a href=\"http:\/\/freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com\/2009\/02\/18\/blnk\/\">throw its rhetorical hat<\/a> into this particular ring, which seems fitting given the authors&#8217; focus on the conjunction of economics and society. Both Alan Mutter and Clay Shirky show up in this forum as well, making similar arguments &#8212; the former in favour of micropayments, which he says will overcome the &#8220;Original Sin&#8221; of giving content away for free online, adding that readers wouldn&#8217;t mind being nickel-and-dimed &#8220;if the content were sufficiently unique and compelling.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Shirky, meanwhile, argues that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Online, small payments only work when the collector of those payments has end-to-end control of delivery, generally by controlling the hardware or software the user has access to. (This is true of all metered billing, in fact.)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>and adds: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The fantasy that small payments will save publishers as they move online is really a fantasy that monopoly pricing power can be re-established over we users. Invoking the magic word \u201cmicropayments\u201d is thus grabbing the wrong end of the stick; if online publishers had that kind of pricing power, micropayments wouldn\u2019t be necessary. And since they don\u2019t have that pricing power, micropayments won\u2019t provide it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><i>(read the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.niemanlab.org\/2009\/02\/the-micropayment-debate-continues\/\">rest of this post<\/a> at the Nieman Journalism Lab)<\/i><\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Is it possible to be fascinated by an issue and yet tired of it at the same time? If so, then micropayments for online news pretty much fits that bill for me. I know that it&#8217;s a crucial time for the newspaper business (which pays my salary), and I know that many thoughtful and intelligent &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2009\/02\/19\/the-micropayment-debate-continues\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The micropayment debate continues&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4302"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4302\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}