{"id":3697,"date":"2008-11-30T01:44:14","date_gmt":"2008-11-30T05:44:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=3697"},"modified":"2008-11-30T01:44:14","modified_gmt":"2008-11-30T05:44:14","slug":"msft-and-yahoo-nom-nom-nom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/11\/30\/msft-and-yahoo-nom-nom-nom\/","title":{"rendered":"MSFT and Yahoo: Nom nom nom"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kara Swisher at All Things Digital always gives me grief when I do this, but I&#8217;m going to do it anyway: Namely, point to a rumour &#8212; in this case, a rumour in the Times of London about Microsoft <a href=\"http:\/\/business.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/business\/industry_sectors\/technology\/article5258258.ece\">making some kind of<\/a> convoluted deal to proceed with what amounts to a creeping takeover of Yahoo (<strong>Update<\/strong>: Kara says that <a href=\"http:\/\/kara.allthingsd.com\/20081129\/total-fiction-there-is-no-20-billion-microsoft-deal-to-buy-yahoo-search\/\">sources tell her<\/a> it is &#8220;total fiction&#8221;). According to the report, the deal would involve Ross Levinsohn (formerly of Fox Interactive Media) and Jonathan Miller (formerly of Yahoo) raising $5-billion and Microsoft putting in another $5-billion, and the two groups acquiring a 30-per-cent stake in the troubled Web giant, which Levinsohn and Miller would run. Microsoft would manage the search business and would have a call option on buying the whole enchilada for $20-billion.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>MG Siegler at VentureBeat says he ran this report by Levinsohn, who said he had no idea <a href=\"http:\/\/venturebeat.com\/2008\/11\/29\/a-new-elaborate-20-billion-deal-for-microsoft-to-buy-yahoo-search\/\">what the paper was talking about<\/a>. Which would normally put such a rumour to rest pretty quickly, except for a couple of things: The first is that this is a pretty detailed story in the Times of London, a paper not known for running off at the mouth with crazy rumours. If it had appeared in the Daily Mail or the Inquirer or something like that, then I would be dubious. But this particular report has plenty of detail, although there are no sources given (just the usual oblique phrase &#8220;it is thought&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>The second reason for believing something might be up, even if it&#8217;s not this specific deal, is the simple fact that Microsoft <a href=\"http:\/\/watchmojo.com\/web\/blog\/index.php\/2008\/11\/29\/msftyahoo-round-2-what-will-probably-happen\/\">desperately wants<\/a> Yahoo&#8217;s search business, and Yahoo just as desperately wants to dance with the giant software company somehow. Although Steve Ballmer keeps saying he isn&#8217;t interested in Yahoo, a lot of that could be designed to push the stock price down and make it easier to acquire the whole company &#8212; and even when he tries to put the kibosh on a takeover, he has left the door open for a search deal. The Levinsohn-Miller arrangement seems overly complicated to me, but it&#8217;s not hard to believe that something is up.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kara Swisher at All Things Digital always gives me grief when I do this, but I&#8217;m going to do it anyway: Namely, point to a rumour &#8212; in this case, a rumour in the Times of London about Microsoft making some kind of convoluted deal to proceed with what amounts to a creeping takeover of &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/11\/30\/msft-and-yahoo-nom-nom-nom\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;MSFT and Yahoo: Nom nom nom&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3697\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}