{"id":2586,"date":"2008-08-12T16:48:37","date_gmt":"2008-08-12T20:48:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=2586"},"modified":"2008-08-12T16:48:37","modified_gmt":"2008-08-12T20:48:37","slug":"no-one-actually-follows-2000-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/08\/12\/no-one-actually-follows-2000-people\/","title":{"rendered":"No one actually &#8220;follows&#8221; 2,000 people"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s plenty of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2008\/08\/12\/twitters-2000-follow-limit-raises-a-ruckus-but-how-many-people-can-you-seriously-keep-track-of-anyway\/\">discussion<\/a> out there (and I use that term loosely) about Twitter imposing limits on the number of people users can follow. This seems to have gotten started by a post from Brent Csutoras <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brentcsutoras.com\/2008\/08\/11\/twitter-limits-following-to-2000\/\">saying he ran into<\/a> a 2,000-follower limit and was surprised by it, even though co-founder Evan Williams <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.twitter.com\/2008\/08\/making-progress-on-spam.html\">described<\/a> the rationale for the limits on the Twitter blog in a post last week &#8212; including the fact that there is no hard-and-fast number for how many followers you can have, something he expanded on <a href=\"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/2008\/08\/11\/twitter-going-fremium-limiting-followers-to-2000\/\">in a comment<\/a> on GigaOm.<\/p>\n<p>When I first saw these reports, I wondered the same thing that Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch does <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2008\/08\/12\/twitters-2000-follow-limit-raises-a-ruckus-but-how-many-people-can-you-seriously-keep-track-of-anyway\/\">in his post<\/a>: namely, who the heck can follow 2,000 (or more) people on Twitter? I realize that Loic LeMeur of Seesmic and the Scobleizer and others have tens of thousands of people they follow, and claim that this enriches their lives greatly, but I don&#8217;t think they mean the same thing by &#8220;follow&#8221; that any rational person would (and Loic&#8217;s argument <a href=\"http:\/\/www.loiclemeur.com\/english\/2008\/08\/10-reasons-why.html\">seems to boil down<\/a> to the fact that it&#8217;s polite to follow people back if they follow you). <\/p>\n<p>If I recall correctly, Scoble has said that with 20,000 people on his follow list, he gets a tweet every second, or more. I would argue that&#8217;s just white noise at best &#8212; like having the radio on while you&#8217;re doing something else. It&#8217;s certainly not actually paying attention to someone. Twitter&#8217;s limits seem like a sensible response to &#8220;follow spam,&#8221; which has been on the increase, and I hope they don&#8217;t cave in just because some people want to brag about how many people they&#8217;re following.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s plenty of discussion out there (and I use that term loosely) about Twitter imposing limits on the number of people users can follow. This seems to have gotten started by a post from Brent Csutoras saying he ran into a 2,000-follower limit and was surprised by it, even though co-founder Evan Williams described the &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/08\/12\/no-one-actually-follows-2000-people\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;No one actually &#8220;follows&#8221; 2,000 people&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2586","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2586","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2586"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2586\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}