{"id":2462,"date":"2008-06-02T23:01:31","date_gmt":"2008-06-03T03:01:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=2462"},"modified":"2008-06-02T23:01:31","modified_gmt":"2008-06-03T03:01:31","slug":"mixx-growing-but-is-it-enough","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/06\/02\/mixx-growing-but-is-it-enough\/","title":{"rendered":"Mixx: Growing, but is it enough?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So Mixx &#8212; a Digg-like social news app &#8212; has been bragging to anyone who will listen that its traffic has doubled to a million uniques a month in May, and it is getting lots of love from its mainstream-media partners, including USA Today, Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, Reuters and Slate. But is a million uniques good or bad? That depends on who you ask (or whom, if you&#8217;re going to get all grammatical on me). Marshall Kirkpatrick at Read\/Write Web <a href=\"http:\/\/www.readwriteweb.com\/archives\/mixx_still_tiny.php\">isn&#8217;t impressed<\/a>, since that&#8217;s a lot less than the 26 million uniques that Digg gets every month. Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2008\/06\/02\/the-cnncom-effect-mixx-more-than-doubles-vistors-in-may-to-nearly-one-million\/\">seems<\/a> a little more impressed, and Nick O&#8217;Neill over at the Social Times blog says that it&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.socialtimes.com\/2008\/06\/is-mixx-growing-fast-enough\/\">nothing to sneeze at<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Nick has a point when he says that 200-per-cent growth in a single month is pretty impressive, although it&#8217;s worth noting that such growth rates aren&#8217;t unheard of when a site is coming from a small base. My ability to bench-press 350 pounds increased by 200 per cent last month as well, but that&#8217;s because I was able to do three of them instead of just one. Marshall&#8217;s point <a href=\"http:\/\/www.readwriteweb.com\/archives\/mixx_still_tiny.php\">seems to be<\/a> that Mixx should be seeing even more growth given some of the top-tier names that are adding Mixx links to their news stories. As the Washington Post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/06\/01\/AR2008060101920_pf.html\">notes<\/a>, many of those connections come from Mixx founder Chris McGill&#8217;s former ties to Yahoo and USA Today (McGill <a href=\"http:\/\/www.readwriteweb.com\/archives\/mixx_still_tiny.php#comment-56756\">has responded<\/a> to Marshall&#8217;s post).<\/p>\n<p>Drew Curtis, the founder of Fark, makes an interesting point in the Washington Post story: he says he doesn&#8217;t think social-news services such as Digg and Mixx are a great fit with mainstream media sites. &#8220;<em>Most people don&#8217;t bother with them because they&#8217;re either lazy or they just don&#8217;t care,<\/em>&#8221; he says. A little harsh, but pretty close to the truth, I would argue. Mixx may have no trouble attracting social-news junkies &#8212; although I find it cluttered and don&#8217;t see much in the way of community there (something Tony Hung <a href=\"http:\/\/www.readwriteweb.com\/archives\/mixx_still_tiny.php#comment-56739\">mentions<\/a> as well) &#8212; but will many of those come from the links at CNN or USA Today? I&#8217;m not so sure.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So Mixx &#8212; a Digg-like social news app &#8212; has been bragging to anyone who will listen that its traffic has doubled to a million uniques a month in May, and it is getting lots of love from its mainstream-media partners, including USA Today, Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, Reuters and Slate. But &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/06\/02\/mixx-growing-but-is-it-enough\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Mixx: Growing, but is it enough?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2462\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}