{"id":2424,"date":"2008-05-15T22:02:06","date_gmt":"2008-05-16T02:02:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=2424"},"modified":"2008-05-15T22:02:06","modified_gmt":"2008-05-16T02:02:06","slug":"what-is-mark-mahaney-smoking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/05\/15\/what-is-mark-mahaney-smoking\/","title":{"rendered":"What is Mark Mahaney smoking?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Whatever it is, I would like some. According to Henry Blodget, the Citigroup analyst seems to think that Amazon <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alleyinsider.com\/2008\/5\/amazon_kindle_a_750_million_ipod_like_business_by_2010_amzn_\">will be selling<\/a> $750-million worth of its Kindle e-book readers within two years. What actual data is this analysis based on, you ask? Absolutely none whatsoever, as Kevin Maney <a href=\"http:\/\/www.portfolio.com\/views\/blogs\/the-tech-observer\/2008\/05\/15\/citigroup-makes-bold-kindle-projection-based-onwellguessing\">points out<\/a> at Portfolio, since the company has refused to give any details about Kindle sales. In other words, it&#8217;s just a bald-ass guess. And as far as I can tell, it&#8217;s a howler.<\/p>\n<p>As Henry himself knows all too well, making outlandish claims about what stocks and\/or products <a href=\"http:\/\/digitaldaily.allthingsd.com\/20080515\/kindle\/\">will do in the future<\/a> can get you noticed pretty quickly &#8212; so maybe that&#8217;s what Mark is after here. Or maybe it&#8217;s a kind of thought experiment, in which you run some theoretical numbers in order to get a rough sense of what might happen. In any case, while Henry seems to think Mahaney&#8217;s estimates are reasonable and even likely in some cases, the whole thing seems off base to me.<\/p>\n<p>The Citigroup analyst figures that Amazon will see the same kind of sales growth for its e-book readers as Apple saw for its iPods, but will only sell about half as many. That seems <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alleyinsider.com\/2008\/5\/amazon_kindle_a_750_million_ipod_like_business_by_2010_amzn_\">hugely inflated<\/a>. Like Mahaney, I have absolutely no figures to back me up, but I would guess that the market for e-book readers is less than one-tenth the size of the market for portable music players, perhaps even smaller. And the idea that users will buy a book a month just seems insane. And there&#8217;s also the Apple factor, as Rex and others <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rexblog.com\/2008\/05\/15\/17661\/\">have pointed out<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The only aspect that Henry seems to agree is &#8220;optimistic&#8221; is the idea that Amazon will make the same kind of revenue from e-books as it does from printed books. As Blodget notes, that doesn&#8217;t seem likely to happen anytime soon &#8212; since publishers will need to be convinced to sell them, and readers will need to be convinced to buy them, and that means they need to be cheap &#8212; and may never happen at all. I don&#8217;t know what Mark Mahaney was trying to do with his Kindle analysis, but if he was trying to make a credible argument, he failed.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Whatever it is, I would like some. According to Henry Blodget, the Citigroup analyst seems to think that Amazon will be selling $750-million worth of its Kindle e-book readers within two years. What actual data is this analysis based on, you ask? Absolutely none whatsoever, as Kevin Maney points out at Portfolio, since the company &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/05\/15\/what-is-mark-mahaney-smoking\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;What is Mark Mahaney smoking?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2424\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}