{"id":2422,"date":"2008-05-14T15:52:10","date_gmt":"2008-05-14T19:52:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=2422"},"modified":"2008-05-14T15:52:10","modified_gmt":"2008-05-14T19:52:10","slug":"video-comments-actually-not-so-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/05\/14\/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad\/","title":{"rendered":"Video comments: Actually not so bad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So Disqus has enabled support for video comments from Seesmic, which launched the feature on TechCrunch awhile back. Even Fred Wilson of A VC &#8212; who is an investor in Disqus &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/avc.blogs.com\/a_vc\/2008\/05\/disqus-and-sees.html\">admits in his post<\/a> that he isn&#8217;t sure about whether video comments work or not. And there are lots of people who are <a href=\"http:\/\/venturebeat.com\/2008\/05\/14\/because-you-asked-for-it-right-disqus-and-seesmic-team-up-for-video-comments\/\">pretty sure<\/a> that they <a href=\"http:\/\/www.markevanstech.com\/2008\/05\/14\/video-comments-huh\/\">don&#8217;t work<\/a>, because you can&#8217;t scan them as easily as you can text, because they clutter up a blog and make it slow to load, and so on. And I must admit that when TechCrunch first launched them, I wasn&#8217;t too crazy about the idea either.<\/p>\n<p>As I&#8217;ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/02\/14\/seesmic-still-dont-really-get-it\/\">said before<\/a> on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/09\/15\/video-blogging-isnt-for-everyone\/\">several occasions<\/a>, I&#8217;m not really a video guy. I don&#8217;t think it adds that much to have video, unless (as Scoble notes in Fred&#8217;s comment section) you are showing someone something that relies on the visual element, like a new gadget or a new baby. But when I wrote my earlier post on the topic, I was mostly talking about video blogs &#8212; the ones that are exclusively video. Unless you&#8217;re <a href=\"http:\/\/1938media.com\">Loren Feldman<\/a> of 1938media (and let&#8217;s face it, who is?) that kind of thing reminds me of the Seinfeld episode when Kramer bought an old talk-show set and turned his living room into a fake talk show, but no one would go on.<\/p>\n<p>That said, I&#8217;m actually thinking that video comments aren&#8217;t such a bad idea (some people <a href=\"http:\/\/www.centernetworks.com\/disqus-seesmic-video-comments\">continue to disagree<\/a>). I don&#8217;t want everyone to use them, and I don&#8217;t want all the comments on a blog to be video &#8212; but in some cases it&#8217;s kind of fun to see Mike Arrington <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2008\/05\/13\/ok-wired-lets-do-this\/#comment-2295205\">talking about<\/a> Wired magazine, or to see Fred <a href=\"http:\/\/avc.blogs.com\/a_vc\/2008\/05\/disqus-and-sees.html#comment-461839\">in person<\/a> chatting into his web-cam. It is much more personal (which is why some people will probably never do it). But I actually don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that bad. I think it adds a little variety &#8212; and if you don&#8217;t want to watch them, then you don&#8217;t have to. For an alternate (and hilarious) view, see <a href=\"http:\/\/expertidiot.com\/19\/video-comments-blow-me\/\">this overview<\/a> by Scrivs at Expert Idiot.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So Disqus has enabled support for video comments from Seesmic, which launched the feature on TechCrunch awhile back. Even Fred Wilson of A VC &#8212; who is an investor in Disqus &#8212; admits in his post that he isn&#8217;t sure about whether video comments work or not. And there are lots of people who are &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/05\/14\/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Video comments: Actually not so bad&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2422"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2422\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}