{"id":2368,"date":"2008-04-25T16:48:20","date_gmt":"2008-04-25T21:48:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=2368"},"modified":"2008-04-25T16:48:20","modified_gmt":"2008-04-25T21:48:20","slug":"web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/04\/25\/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip\/","title":{"rendered":"Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&#8217;s get a grip"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Caroline McCarthy of CNET&#8217;s blog The Social has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.news.com\/8301-13577_3-9928453-36.html\">a long post<\/a> that uses as a jumping-off point the party at this week&#8217;s Web 2.0 conference thrown by Mashable, with sponsorship from a new social-networking startup (still in alpha) called Chi.mp. The highlight of Caroline&#8217;s post, as Erick Schonfeld of TechCrunch <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/erickschonfeld\/statuses\/797013801\">noted<\/a> on Twitter, was a line from an anonymous observer, who provided this humdinger:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I&#8217;ll tell you what Chi.mp is. It&#8217;s venture money getting set on fire.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, no one cares what Chi.mp is or does, and even an alpha site clearly has enough VC money to blow on a fancy party. What does this prove exactly? Nothing, really &#8212; although it sure is a great quote. Caroline <a href=\"http:\/\/www.news.com\/8301-13577_3-9928453-36.html\">goes on to quote<\/a> one of Tim O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s typically enthusiastic comments about the Web&#8217;s effect on the world, in which he says that &#8220;We&#8217;re at a turning point akin to literacy or the formation of cities,&#8221; and then she notes how it&#8217;s easy to raise money if you&#8217;re PayPal founder Max Levchin or serial entrepreneur Marc Andreessen, but everyone else had better watch their step because the Web economy looks tippy.<\/p>\n<p>Given that the party &#8212; which McCarthy seems to see as a kind of 1920s, pre-crash, Gatsby-style bacchanal &#8212; was thrown by Mashable, it&#8217;s probably not surprising that Mashable writer Adam Ostrow steps up to <a href=\"http:\/\/mashable.com\/2008\/04\/25\/dotcom-bust\/\">challenge the CNET blogger&#8217;s post<\/a>. But I think Adam (who is also a Web entrepreneur, having acquired and relaunched Readburner.com) makes a number of good points. The bottom line is that the Web makes it so much easier to start and run a business &#8212; and yes, I&#8217;m using that term broadly &#8212; that it&#8217;s hard to see where the sturm und drang about the crumbling Web 2.0 &#8220;economy&#8221; comes from.<\/p>\n<p>As Adam points out, the previous bubble was made up of companies with sky-high valuations that had gone public. How many Web companies have done that this time around? Not many. So Slide convinces VCs it&#8217;s worth $300-million, and Twitter raises money <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alleyinsider.com\/2008\/4\/how_much_is_twitter_raising_and_how_much_is_it_worth_\">at a $60-million valuation<\/a> based on hopes and dreams &#8212; so what? That doesn&#8217;t hurt anyone except VCs who should know better. Web startups will continue to pop up like mushrooms because it&#8217;s just so cheap to put them together. Eric Ly started a scheduling service called Presdo with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2008\/04\/25\/presdo-the-magical-online-scheduler\/\">$35,000 and some code<\/a> he wrote in a weekend. Let&#8217;s try and relax, shall we?<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Caroline McCarthy of CNET&#8217;s blog The Social has a long post that uses as a jumping-off point the party at this week&#8217;s Web 2.0 conference thrown by Mashable, with sponsorship from a new social-networking startup (still in alpha) called Chi.mp. The highlight of Caroline&#8217;s post, as Erick Schonfeld of TechCrunch noted on Twitter, was a &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/04\/25\/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&#8217;s get a grip&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}