{"id":2293,"date":"2008-03-27T14:12:22","date_gmt":"2008-03-27T19:12:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/03\/27\/crack-deal-on-google-streetview\/"},"modified":"2008-03-27T14:12:22","modified_gmt":"2008-03-27T19:12:22","slug":"crack-deal-on-google-streetview","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/03\/27\/crack-deal-on-google-streetview\/","title":{"rendered":"Crack deal on Google Streetview?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It has yet to make its way to Canada (although the cars have been spotted, and there has already been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20070924.wgtgoogprivacy0924\/BNStory\/Technology\/?page=rss&amp;id=RTGAM.20070924.wgtgoogprivacy0924\">controversy<\/a> over privacy laws) but in many U.S. cities, Google&#8217;s &#8220;Streetview&#8221; service provides high-resolution photos of the street when you select a location on Google Maps. A whole subculture <a href=\"http:\/\/www.streetviewfun.com\/\">has emerged<\/a> on the Web since the service went live, of people trading and commenting on photos of people sunbathing nude, words carved into cornfields and so on.<\/p>\n<p>This week, a series of photographs showed up on several sites that appeared to show two men engaging in a drug deal on the streets of Chicago. Although the photos have since been removed from Google&#8217;s database, there are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.geekologie.com\/2008\/03\/crack_deal_caught_on_google_ma.php\">still plenty<\/a> of <a href=\"http:\/\/gawker.com\/5004469\/a-drug-deal-caught-from-every-angle\">versions of<\/a> them available on the Web. But do they actually show a drug deal? There&#8217;s a black man in a baseball cap, large white T-shirt and baggy jeans bending over into the window of a car, with what appears to be cash or a small package in his hand &#8212; but does that mean it&#8217;s a drug deal?<\/p>\n<p>Some commenters <a href=\"http:\/\/gawker.com\/5004469\/a-drug-deal-caught-from-every-angle\">at Gawker<\/a> and elsewhere argued that to assume it was a drug deal was an overtly racist response. Others, however &#8212; including some Chicago residents &#8212; were more than happy to chime in that the area was a well-known drug neighbourhood, and in one case a commenter said that she had bought drugs at <a href=\"http:\/\/gawker.com\/5004469\/a-drug-deal-caught-from-every-angle#c4839221\">that exact location<\/a> before. Another said that he was &#8220;robbed at gunpoint while trying to buy pot&#8221; at the same spot. And Gawker editor Nick Denton pointed to a local site <a href=\"http:\/\/chicago.everyblock.com\/crime\/filter\/?loc=zipcodes:60653&amp;primary_type=narcotics&amp;d_to=3\/20\/2008&amp;d_from=1\/25\/2008\">with crime statistics<\/a> for the area that seemed to back up the drug-deal explanation.<\/p>\n<p>Just one troubling point, as more than one commenter noted: the Google Streetview photos are taken by a car &#8212; in most cases a Volkswagen Beetle &#8212; with a 360-degree camera mounted on a tripod on the roof. If the other men near the car were (as some argued) keeping an eye out for cops, how could they not notice a Beetle driving by with a gigantic camera strapped to its roof? Whoever the dealer is, he needs some new lookouts.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It has yet to make its way to Canada (although the cars have been spotted, and there has already been controversy over privacy laws) but in many U.S. cities, Google&#8217;s &#8220;Streetview&#8221; service provides high-resolution photos of the street when you select a location on Google Maps. A whole subculture has emerged on the Web since &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/03\/27\/crack-deal-on-google-streetview\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Crack deal on Google Streetview?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2293\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}