{"id":2153,"date":"2008-01-26T10:31:31","date_gmt":"2008-01-26T15:31:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/26\/media-still-grasping-for-a-clue\/"},"modified":"2008-01-26T10:31:31","modified_gmt":"2008-01-26T15:31:31","slug":"media-still-grasping-for-a-clue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/26\/media-still-grasping-for-a-clue\/","title":{"rendered":"Media: Still grasping for a clue"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We can all debate the wisdom of the Wall Street Journal maintaining a pay wall (or at least part of one &#8212; see my recent post), and even the wisdom of newspapers and media sites having registration walls. But surely we&#8217;ve gotten beyond the point where anyone would argue that publications should try to control where and how you <strong>link<\/strong> to them, right? Wrong. According to a <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.smugmug.com\/don\/2008\/01\/24\/why-traditional-print-media-is-doomed\/\">post by Don McAskill<\/a>, CEO of image-sharing site SmugMug, BusinessWeek specifically asked him not to link directly to a recent article they wrote about his company.<\/p>\n<p>When I first read that, I confess that my jaw dropped open in amazement. Did I go through a time warp of some kind that put me back in the mid-1990s? No. But reading through BusinessWeek&#8217;s bizarre and long-winded <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/copyrt.htm\">&#8220;user agreement&#8221;<\/a> is like going back a decade or more, to a time when traditional media &#8212; and companies of all kinds &#8212; thought they could control how users accessed or made use of the material on their websites, right down to preventing them from linking to certain things.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, if you read through the part of the policy that covers &#8220;deep-linking,&#8221; which is made to sound like something heinous and clearly illegal, it also forbids &#8220;bots&#8221; from going through the site, which would seem to cover what Google and pretty much every other search engine on earth does. That&#8217;s smart. Don&#8217;t just try to block people from linking to your articles &#8212; try to prevent them from ever being found at all! Brilliant. (The BusinessWeek article is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/magazine\/content\/08_03\/b4067202218875.htm\">here,<\/a> in case you want to read it).<\/p>\n<p>Don also writes about how <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/printedition\/front\/la-fi-smug24dec24,1,242930.story?ctrack=1&amp;cset=true\">a story<\/a> the L.A. Times wrote about SmugMug isn&#8217;t available easily either, because of the site&#8217;s registration wall. I know I&#8217;ve been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/12\/29\/how-many-does-registration-keep-out\/\">stopped short before<\/a> by the Times wall (check the comment at that link &#8212; the registration wall pops up after a certain number of visits), and each time I go away and never read the article that has been linked to. I know I could just use BugMeNot, but I just can&#8217;t be bothered, and so the story goes unread. How is that doing anyone any good? That&#8217;s pretty dumb &#8212; but BusinessWeek takes the cake.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We can all debate the wisdom of the Wall Street Journal maintaining a pay wall (or at least part of one &#8212; see my recent post), and even the wisdom of newspapers and media sites having registration walls. But surely we&#8217;ve gotten beyond the point where anyone would argue that publications should try to control &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/26\/media-still-grasping-for-a-clue\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Media: Still grasping for a clue&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}