{"id":2122,"date":"2008-01-16T09:06:44","date_gmt":"2008-01-16T14:06:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/16\/hasbro-and-mattel-dumb-dumb-dumb\/"},"modified":"2008-01-16T09:06:44","modified_gmt":"2008-01-16T14:06:44","slug":"hasbro-and-mattel-dumb-dumb-dumb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/16\/hasbro-and-mattel-dumb-dumb-dumb\/","title":{"rendered":"Hasbro and Mattel: Dumb, dumb, dumb"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There are two ways you can look at a popular Facebook app like Scrabulous, which is clearly an online version of Scrabble, one of the most popular board games of all time (at least for anyone with a cottage where it sometimes rains and there is no television). One is to see it as a rip-off of a company&#8217;s trademarked property &#8212; which is clearly the way that Hasbro and Mattel see it, since they have reportedly <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/technology\/7191264.stm\">sent legal letters<\/a> to Facebook asking them to remove the app.<\/p>\n<p>The other way to see to see it, of course, is as a tribute to the popularity of Scrabble, and a kind of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2008\/01\/11\/hasbro-tries-to-shut-down-scrabulous\/\">viral marketing<\/a> for the actual game. There are dozens of (admittedly anecdotal) stories of people going out and <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/technology\/7191264.stm\">buying<\/a> Scrabble games to continue their online addiction offline. How many of those people would have bought a Scrabble game before Scrabulous came along? A tiny number, at best. So why not just <a href=\"http:\/\/techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com\/2008\/01\/11\/will-someone-please-start-a-facebook-group-to-save-scrabulous\/\">buy the app<\/a> from the developers for a couple of hundred grand and call it a day?<\/p>\n<p>From a legal perspective, Hasbro and Mattel are no doubt totally within their rights to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/main.jhtml?xml=\/news\/2008\/01\/16\/nscrabble116.xml\">have the app removed<\/a>, or to sue, or do whatever they wish to protect their trademark. But from a marketing perspective I think they are missing the point. It reminds me of Coca-Cola&#8217;s initial reaction to <a href=\"http:\/\/eepybird.com\/dcm1.html\">the Eepybird video<\/a> with the Coke and the Mentos &#8212; they said they were considering legal action, because &#8220;that&#8217;s not how we want consumers to interact with our brand.&#8221; Morons. <\/p>\n<p>Eventually someone at Coca-Cola saw the light, thank God, and realized that how people interact with your brand is pretty much up to them, not you. If you&#8217;re smart, you will be glad they are interacting with it at all, and you will find a way to capitalize on it. I think another way to look at Scrabulous is as the online version of a tribute band, or like the fansites that specialize in fiction based on Star Trek or Star Wars &#8212; some companies see that as trademark infringement, others see it as an opportunity.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are two ways you can look at a popular Facebook app like Scrabulous, which is clearly an online version of Scrabble, one of the most popular board games of all time (at least for anyone with a cottage where it sometimes rains and there is no television). One is to see it as a &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/16\/hasbro-and-mattel-dumb-dumb-dumb\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Hasbro and Mattel: Dumb, dumb, dumb&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2122\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}