{"id":2089,"date":"2008-01-08T10:56:34","date_gmt":"2008-01-08T15:56:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/08\/the-pay-for-traffic-debate-continues\/"},"modified":"2008-01-08T10:56:34","modified_gmt":"2008-01-08T15:56:34","slug":"the-pay-for-traffic-debate-continues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/08\/the-pay-for-traffic-debate-continues\/","title":{"rendered":"The &#8220;pay for traffic&#8221; debate continues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lucasgrindley.com\/2008\/01\/critics_slam_on_popularity_pay_needs_imm.html\">Lucas Grindley&#8217;s blog<\/a>, I came across a fairly daft piece from the Miami Herald, written by journalism professor Edward Wasserman, about how compensating journalists based on the traffic they draw is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.miamiherald.com\/430\/story\/369434.html\">A Bad Thing<\/a>. As Lucas points out, the example used by the professor of what a dangerous phenomenon this is &#8212; Penelope Trunk <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.penelopetrunk.com\/2007\/12\/27\/how-to-deal-with-getting-fired-from-yahoo\/\">getting fired<\/a> by Yahoo Finance &#8212; doesn&#8217;t even help his argument.<\/p>\n<p>Wasserman says that Trunk (not her real name, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Penelope_Trunk\">apparently<\/a>) was let go because her blog didn&#8217;t get enough traffic. According to the writer, however, her column got tons of traffic &#8212; the problem was that Yahoo couldn&#8217;t earn enough from that traffic because it was designated as &#8220;career&#8221; content, and the CPM advertising rates for that kind of content aren&#8217;t high enough. That has little or nothing to do with whether paying journalists based on traffic is a good thing or a bad thing. <\/p>\n<p>In any case, Trunk was <a href=\"http:\/\/mindymcadams.com\/tojou\/2008\/pay-per-view-make-that-get-paid-per-viewer\/\">a columnist\/blogger<\/a>, not an investigative journalist writing for the front page of a news site. And as I&#8217;ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/01\/pay-for-traffic-incentive-or-distortion\/\">written before<\/a>, I think paying bloggers and columnists based in part on the traffic they draw isn&#8217;t such a bad idea. But Wasserman glides smoothly from mentioning Trunk&#8217;s case to talking about &#8220;handing influence&#8230; over editorial content to the outside people who write the checks&#8221; and how editors will soon be &#8220;redrawing the front page&#8221; based on such factors. <\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s an Evel Kneivel-sized leap there, professor. The fact is that career columnists &#8212; and columnists in general &#8212; are hired and fired based on far more obscure or irrelevant factors than traffic or CPMs, including the fact that a senior editor went to school with them, they once had a book published, or they look good in an evening gown. Welcome to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jacklail.com\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/paying-starving-journalists-wi.html\">world of journalism<\/a>. Find me a reporter whose stuff is killed or moved or who is fired because of low traffic and then we can talk.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Via Lucas Grindley&#8217;s blog, I came across a fairly daft piece from the Miami Herald, written by journalism professor Edward Wasserman, about how compensating journalists based on the traffic they draw is A Bad Thing. As Lucas points out, the example used by the professor of what a dangerous phenomenon this is &#8212; Penelope Trunk &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2008\/01\/08\/the-pay-for-traffic-debate-continues\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The &#8220;pay for traffic&#8221; debate continues&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2089"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2089\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}