{"id":1929,"date":"2007-11-15T10:36:10","date_gmt":"2007-11-15T15:36:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/11\/15\/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well\/"},"modified":"2007-11-15T10:36:10","modified_gmt":"2007-11-15T15:36:10","slug":"is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/11\/15\/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well\/","title":{"rendered":"Is email dead? No, but it&#8217;s not well"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After I wrote a post yesterday about Google and Yahoo&#8217;s plans to turn email into a Facebook-style social hub, someone commented and included a link to <a href=\"http:\/\/slate.com\/id\/2177969\/pagenum\/all\/#page_start\">a Slate piece<\/a> about the &#8220;death of email.&#8221; As Zoli Erdos notes in his response, this kind of thing comes along <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zoliblog.com\/2007\/11\/15\/email-is-still-not-dead-2\/\">pretty regularly<\/a> &#8212; email is dead, the kids don&#8217;t use it any more, etc.<\/p>\n<p>My point on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/11\/14\/can-getting-social-make-email-better\/\">Yahoo\/Google post<\/a> was that younger people barely use email at all, and if those two giants want to jump on the social-networking bandwagon, maybe email isn&#8217;t the best approach. I&#8217;ve learned through hard experience that if I want to send a link or a quick question to either of my teenaged daughters, <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20071114\/144228.shtml\">email barely works at all<\/a> &#8212; they hardly ever check it, and so I&#8217;m reduced to saying &#8220;Did you get that link I sent you?&#8221; at which point they go and check it, which kind of defeats the purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Obviously, my daughters won&#8217;t be teenagers forever. Eventually they will (I sincerely hope) get jobs and become productive members of society &#8212; at which point they will no doubt be forced to deal with the massive time-sucking drain on productivity that we call email. They too will get to enjoy the main feature of email: what some like to call an &#8220;audit trail&#8221; and others like to describe as &#8220;butt-covering.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s face it: by CC&#8217;ing everyone under the sun, sending long messages late on a Friday afternoon, including miscellaneous attachments for no reason and otherwise gumming things up, certain people achieve the appearance of work without actually having to do any &#8212; and then when someone calls them on it they can say &#8220;but didn&#8217;t you get my email?&#8221; If Google or <a href=\"http:\/\/uk.techcrunch.com\/2007\/11\/15\/stealth-mode-app-turns-inbox-20-into-life-20\/\">someone else can fix that<\/a>, then more power to them.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/magazine\/content\/05_48\/b3961120.htm\">Email may not be dead<\/a>, but it certainly isn&#8217;t looking too healthy, and hasn&#8217;t for years. As Zoli points out, the best approach is not to replace email with other things like IM or Facebook messages &#8212; which have their own flaws &#8212; but to make use of as many different methods as possible, depending on the situation. In some cases a wiki makes more sense, or a Google document, or a live chat, or (God forbid) even a phone call.<\/p>\n<p>My friend Scott Karp at Publishing 2.0 says that he thinks the whole &#8220;email is dead&#8221; meme <a href=\"http:\/\/publishing2.com\/2007\/11\/15\/email-is-not-dead\/\">is ridiculous<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After I wrote a post yesterday about Google and Yahoo&#8217;s plans to turn email into a Facebook-style social hub, someone commented and included a link to a Slate piece about the &#8220;death of email.&#8221; As Zoli Erdos notes in his response, this kind of thing comes along pretty regularly &#8212; email is dead, the kids &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/11\/15\/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Is email dead? No, but it&#8217;s not well&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1929"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1929\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}