{"id":192,"date":"2006-02-02T12:30:51","date_gmt":"2006-02-02T17:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/index.php\/2006\/02\/02\/telecoms-and-the-toll-road-gambit\/"},"modified":"2006-02-02T12:30:51","modified_gmt":"2006-02-02T17:30:51","slug":"telecoms-and-the-toll-road-gambit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/02\/02\/telecoms-and-the-toll-road-gambit\/","title":{"rendered":"Telecoms and the toll-road gambit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure whether to write anything about the &#8220;network neutrality&#8221; issue, in part because my friend <a href=\"http:\/\/www.robhyndman.com\">Rob Hyndman<\/a> has done such a good job of covering the subject &#8211; particularly an overview of the current state of affairs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.robhyndman.com\/2006\/02\/02\/fat-pipe-always-on-get-out-of-the-way\/\">in his latest post<\/a> &#8211; but as usual I couldn&#8217;t resist \ud83d\ude42  Verizon has reportedly filed documents with the Federal Communications Commission that say it plans to use as much as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/technology\/content\/feb2006\/tc20060202_061809.htm\">80 per cent of its network<\/a> for its own purposes. Everything else would get shoe-horned into the remainder (although Cynthia at IPDemocracy says it might not be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipdemocracy.com\/archives\/2006\/02\/02\/index.php#a001092\">as bad as it sounds<\/a>, and it looks like <a href=\"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/2006\/02\/03\/verizon-fiber-unnecessary-roughness\/\">Om Malik agrees<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>This, of course, is just the latest step in a campaign by the major telcos to <strike>strong-arm<\/strike> convince Internet companies such as Google and Yahoo to pay extra for delivery of their broadband content to consumers, a campaign that got its start with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/index.php\/2005\/12\/14\/the-campaign-for-a-two-tier-internet\/\">comments from Ed<\/a> &#8220;pay up for those pipes&#8221; Whitacre of AT&amp;T (formerly SBC) and Bill Smith of BellSouth. Why should they have to carry all that content on their networks, the telcos complain &#8211; why should Google make money from broadband and not share some of it with the carriers whose pipes they use?<\/p>\n<p>As Mike at Techdirt notes, part of the problem is that the phone companies haven&#8217;t <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20060202\/024219_F.shtml\">spent the money necessary<\/a> to do all the things they want to do on their networks. The telcos made all kinds of promises about upgrades  they planned to make &#8211; in return for which they got various concessions from the U.S. government &#8211; and then they never followed through, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/index.php\/2006\/01\/31\/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch\/\">telecom analyst Bruce Kushnick writes<\/a> in a new book called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newnetworks.com\/broadbandscandals.htm\"><em>The $200-Billion Broadband Scandal<\/em>.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The big question is: Will the U.S. government allow the telcos to get away with this move, or will they step in to enforce some form of network neutrality? There used to be a concept called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cybertelecom.org\/notes\/common_carrier.htm\">the &#8220;common carrier&#8221; principle<\/a>, in which telcos were required to carry any and all voice traffic &#8212; that idea seems to have gone out the window.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure whether to write anything about the &#8220;network neutrality&#8221; issue, in part because my friend Rob Hyndman has done such a good job of covering the subject &#8211; particularly an overview of the current state of affairs in his latest post &#8211; but as usual I couldn&#8217;t resist \ud83d\ude42 Verizon has reportedly filed &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2006\/02\/02\/telecoms-and-the-toll-road-gambit\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Telecoms and the toll-road gambit&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}