{"id":1834,"date":"2007-10-22T16:06:28","date_gmt":"2007-10-22T20:06:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/10\/22\/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc\/"},"modified":"2007-10-22T16:06:28","modified_gmt":"2007-10-22T20:06:28","slug":"maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/10\/22\/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc\/","title":{"rendered":"Maybe people don&#8217;t really want UGC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The vision of social media as a vast, harmonious collective that both generates and consumes &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; is mostly a straw man set up by Web 2.0 critics so they can demolish it (yes, I&#8217;m looking at you, <a href=\"http:\/\/roughtype.com\">Nick Carr<\/a>), but there&#8217;s no question that social media is built on the idea that there&#8217;s plenty of talent out there that traditional media isn&#8217;t letting you see. <\/p>\n<p>But what if people don&#8217;t want to see some unknown singer or musician, no matter how talented they are? What if they really just want to see &#8220;celebrities,&#8221; regardless of whether they&#8217;re talented or not?<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the somewhat disturbing implication (to me at least) of ManiaTV&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/print\/technology\/content\/oct2007\/tc20071021_403467.htm\">decision to forego<\/a> the &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; and go back to the site&#8217;s original model, which was distributing video that featured recognizable names and faces, including Canadian-born Tom Green (who later left the site to go solo from his living room, and recently signed a TV distribution deal). <\/p>\n<p>According to Mania, the site&#8217;s user-generated content didn&#8217;t really drive much traffic. What people have really been coming to see, CEO Peter Hoskins says, are the &#8220;celebrities&#8221; &#8212; and that&#8217;s what advertisers wanted to be associated with as well (he likened user-generated content to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipdemocracy.com\/archives\/002716maniatv_monetizing_ugc_is_like_dumpsterdiving.php\">&#8220;dumpster-diving for gold.&#8221;<\/a>)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;People liked good quality entertainment and advertisers liked quality branded entertainment. Advertisers wanted to distance themselves as far as they possibly could from the user-generated content.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is one of the knocks against YouTube and similar sites, that advertisers won&#8217;t want to have their message appear alongside a clip of some kid hurting himself on a skateboard. The argument in favour has always been that such sites get so much traffic that advertisers would effectively have to put their ads there or risk missing a key demographic.<\/p>\n<p>So was it just that ManiaTV&#8217;s content <a href=\"http:\/\/www.contentinople.com\/author.asp?section_id=429&amp;doc_id=136875&amp;f_src=contentinople_sitedefault\">wasn&#8217;t any good<\/a>, or are people not really that interested in user-generated content? There&#8217;s no question that plenty of content on YouTube gets viewed by millions of people, but perhaps they are the exception. What I find depressing is that people would prefer to watch &#8220;celebrities&#8221; like Tom Green and Dave Navarro instead of some more talented unknown.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The vision of social media as a vast, harmonious collective that both generates and consumes &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; is mostly a straw man set up by Web 2.0 critics so they can demolish it (yes, I&#8217;m looking at you, Nick Carr), but there&#8217;s no question that social media is built on the idea that there&#8217;s plenty &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/10\/22\/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Maybe people don&#8217;t really want UGC&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1834"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1834\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}