{"id":1753,"date":"2007-09-30T13:37:17","date_gmt":"2007-09-30T17:37:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/09\/30\/nyt-on-blog-comments-as-conversation\/"},"modified":"2007-09-30T13:37:17","modified_gmt":"2007-09-30T17:37:17","slug":"nyt-on-blog-comments-as-conversation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/09\/30\/nyt-on-blog-comments-as-conversation\/","title":{"rendered":"NYT on blog comments as conversation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/09\/30\/fashion\/30commenters.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin\">interesting piece<\/a> in the New York Times today (although it was in the Fashion &amp; Style section, which I thought was a little odd). I&#8217;m not sure if the topic signals some kind of evolution in the way the Times looks at the blogosphere or an evolution in the blogosphere itself &#8212; or maybe a bit of both.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s about people who have become known &#8212; &#8220;Internet famous&#8221; &#8212; not for having a popular blog, or for being a YouTube star, but for <em>commenting<\/em> on other people&#8217;s blogs and content (no doubt an academic somewhere will call this &#8220;meta-blogging.&#8221;) As the Times piece puts it:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Since many blogs have a readership of one \u00e2\u20ac\u201d or, at best, the writer, his mother and some guy he sat next to in seventh grade who found him on Google \u00e2\u20ac\u201d piggybacking on a more popular site offers a wider audience for a keyboard jockey\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s gripes and quips. <\/p>\n<p>Not everyone is up to the task of creating a blog with the kind of consistent tone and provocative topics that attract visitors.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Times piece profiles a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.metafilter.com\/activity\/3502\/comments\/ask\/\">Metafilter commenter<\/a> known as DaShiv, as well as Seth Chadwick, who <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chowhound.com\/boards\/6\">posts on<\/a> a food-related site called Chowhound. But my favourite quote comes from Marshall Poe, a professor of new media at the University of Iowa, who describes the motivation of commenters in this way:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153You are one of the millions of people who sit at a computer all day&#8230; every hour you have 10 minutes where you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re not doing anything productive at work, and you can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t look at porn. <\/p>\n<p>So you make a comment and fulfill this desire to show yourself off as a smarty-pants.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Times piece also talks about <a href=\"http:\/\/gawker.com\/commenter\/LolCait\/\">a commenter on Gawker<\/a>, where the site picks and chooses who will be allowed to comment, and so a competition has developed where people try to post the wittiest comments so that they can join the club. Now that&#8217;s social networking.  And DaShiv explains why he prefers to comment at Metafilter rather than starting his own blog:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s easier to join in on a conversation than to start one,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said matter of factly.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And it takes both kinds to make the blogosphere tick.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An interesting piece in the New York Times today (although it was in the Fashion &amp; Style section, which I thought was a little odd). I&#8217;m not sure if the topic signals some kind of evolution in the way the Times looks at the blogosphere or an evolution in the blogosphere itself &#8212; or maybe &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/09\/30\/nyt-on-blog-comments-as-conversation\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;NYT on blog comments as conversation&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1753\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}