{"id":13803,"date":"2018-08-16T01:56:00","date_gmt":"2018-08-16T01:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=13803"},"modified":"2018-08-16T01:56:00","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T01:56:00","slug":"heres-why-we-shouldnt-take-jack-dorseys-promise-to-fix-twitter-seriously","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2018\/08\/16\/heres-why-we-shouldnt-take-jack-dorseys-promise-to-fix-twitter-seriously\/","title":{"rendered":"Here&#8217;s why we shouldn&#8217;t take Jack Dorsey&#8217;s promise to fix Twitter seriously"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>After initially refusing to take action<\/strong>&nbsp;against notorious conspiracy monger Alex Jones\u2014even after virtually&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thewrap.com\/youtube-pulls-alex-jones-and-infowars-channels-following-bans-by-apple-facebook\/\">every major platform<\/a>&nbsp;had removed him for publishing hate speech\u2014Twitter seemed to reluctantly admit that it had a problem, and put Jones in &#8220;Twitter jail&#8221; by suspending his account for seven days.&nbsp;Now, in a wide-ranging interview with the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post<\/em>, part-time CEO Jack Dorsey has&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/technology\/2018\/08\/15\/jack-dorsey-says-hes-rethinking-core-how-twitter-works\/?utm_term=.7eba90c36206\">promised to look closely<\/a>&nbsp;at ways to solve Twitter&#8217;s troll problem, up to and including changing some of the &#8220;incentives&#8221; that are built into the social network and the way it rewards users for certain kinds of behavior.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dorsey&#8217;s promises might seem like a magnanimous gesture, a kind of &#8220;we will stop at nothing&#8221; declaration of purpose. But for anyone who has paid attention to Twitter for more than a nanosecond, there are a couple of significant issues with what the Twitter CEO said. For example, the&nbsp;<em>Post<\/em>&nbsp;notes that &#8220;Dorsey said Twitter hasn\u2019t changed its incentives, which were originally designed to nudge people to interact and keep them engaged, in the 12 years since Twitter was founded.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In other words, only now, more than a decade after Twitter was founded, is Dorsey finally willing to take a hard look at some of the potential negative effects of the technology he and his company created, years after those problems were first brought to&nbsp;their&nbsp;attention. What took so long? The most obvious answer, as with Facebook&#8217;s deliberate attempt to ignore similar problems, is that avoiding or side-stepping those negative aspects was far more lucrative than trying to solve them\u2014harassment and flame wars and misinformation are also known as engagement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"525\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">\u201cIf I had to pick a meme to sum up Twitter, the company, and its leader, it would be this one. Except the dog is <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/jack?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@jack<\/a> Dorsey, and the burning room is America.\u201d &#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/nickbilton?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@nickbilton<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/rMvi7N3eYK\">https:\/\/t.co\/rMvi7N3eYK<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/NIAEql6pXi\">pic.twitter.com\/NIAEql6pXi<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/carlquintanilla\/status\/1030112213326077953?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">August 16, 2018<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But that&#8217;s only part of the problem with Dorsey&#8217;s mea culpa. The second statement in the interview that should set off warning bells is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/technology\/2018\/08\/15\/jack-dorsey-says-hes-rethinking-core-how-twitter-works\/?utm_term=.7eba90c36206\">when the&nbsp;<em>Post<\/em>&nbsp;says<\/a>&nbsp;the Twitter CEO is thinking about &#8220;redesigning key elements of the social network, including the like button and the way Twitter displays users\u2019 follower counts,&#8221; because they no longer reflect what the social network wants people to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">All that&#8217;s necessary, Dorsey appears to be saying, is a few tweaks to Twitter&#8217;s design interface\u2014maybe highlight some things in a different typeface, make a button a little larger or give it a different name\u2014and boom! Problem solved. It&#8217;s like seeing racism and homophobia and other forms of harassment as byproducts of a poorly designed user interface, or some kind of bug in the software, and believing that if we could just do enough A\/B testing, we could solve it once and for all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-embed wp-block-embed-embed\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/alexhern\/status\/1029867668793372674\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The reality is that Twitter&#8217;s problems (and Facebook&#8217;s, and Instagram&#8217;s, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/pinterest-moms-share-parfait-recipes-next-to-qanon-memes\">even Pinterest&#8217;s<\/a>) are not flaws in programming, or reactions to design incentives, they are the result of deep-seated social, cultural, and psychological issues, some of which have been around for hundreds\u2014if not thousands\u2014of years. The walls of the ancient ruins in Pompeii are&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ancient.eu\/article\/467\/pompeii-graffiti-signs--electoral-notices\/\">covered in political graffiti<\/a>&nbsp;that could have been taken directly from Twitter (&#8220;All the deadbeats vote for Thucydides&#8221;).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The idea that a tweak in how the network prioritizes retweets or labels favorites is going to alter that kind of behavior is absurd, especially coming from Twitter, which seems to have spent a majority of its time as a company almost completely in the dark about how or why people use it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It may even be the case, as John Herrman argues in&nbsp;<em>The New York Times<\/em>, that Twitter&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/08\/15\/magazine\/twitters-misguided-quest-to-become-a-forum-for-everything.html\">is simply too large<\/a>&nbsp;to function in the way it wants to, as a kind of town square where ideas compete with one another and everyone&#8217;s speech has exactly the same weight as everyone else&#8217;s. It&#8217;s possible that human beings aren&#8217;t designed to work properly in a &#8220;community&#8221; that consists of 350 million people. But regardless of whether the problem is unsolvable or not, the idea that Twitter can do so by turning a few software dials is nonsense on stilts.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After initially refusing to take action&nbsp;against notorious conspiracy monger Alex Jones\u2014even after virtually&nbsp;every major platform&nbsp;had removed him for publishing hate speech\u2014Twitter seemed to reluctantly admit that it had a problem, and put Jones in &#8220;Twitter jail&#8221; by suspending his account for seven days.&nbsp;Now, in a wide-ranging interview with the&nbsp;Washington Post, part-time CEO Jack Dorsey has&nbsp;promised &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2018\/08\/16\/heres-why-we-shouldnt-take-jack-dorseys-promise-to-fix-twitter-seriously\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Here&#8217;s why we shouldn&#8217;t take Jack Dorsey&#8217;s promise to fix Twitter seriously&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13803"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13803\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}