{"id":1279,"date":"2007-05-09T09:24:50","date_gmt":"2007-05-09T13:24:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/05\/09\/ebay-and-stumbleupon-rumour-still-alive\/"},"modified":"2007-05-09T09:24:50","modified_gmt":"2007-05-09T13:24:50","slug":"ebay-and-stumbleupon-rumour-still-alive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/05\/09\/ebay-and-stumbleupon-rumour-still-alive\/","title":{"rendered":"eBay and StumbleUpon rumour still alive"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" class=\"left\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/stumbleupon.jpg?w=525\" alt='stumbleupon.jpg' \/>They&#8217;re baaaack. The rumours about eBay buying StumbleUpon have resurfaced, but this time it&#8217;s the Wall Street Journal that is <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB117867247556996692.html?apl=y\">breathing new life<\/a> into the story &#8212; a tale that was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2007\/04\/18\/stumbleupon-signs-term-sheet-to-be-acquired\/\">sparked first<\/a> by TechCrunch back in April. At that point, the site &#8212; which was created by Garrett Camp and two university friends in Calgary &#8212; was rumoured to have talked with Google and Yahoo as well as eBay, and the price was <a href=\"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/2007\/04\/18\/ebay-likely-buyer-for-stumbleupon\/\">said to be<\/a> in the $45-million range. Now, according to the WSJ, it&#8217;s more like $75-million. Not bad for a site that has 2 million users. <\/p>\n<p>Does it make sense for eBay? When the rumours first surfaced I wrote a post saying that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/04\/18\/ebay-and-stumbleupon-dont-get-it\/\">I didn&#8217;t get it<\/a>, and I still don&#8217;t. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pronetadvertising.com\/articles\/ebay-and-stumbleupon-unite-to-take-on-multibillion-dollar-social-shopping-industry99822.html\">Muhammad Saleem<\/a> at ProNet and <a href=\"http:\/\/mashable.com\/2007\/04\/18\/ebay-stumbleupon\/\">Pete Cashmore<\/a> at Mashable wrote about how they could see it working, but I still don&#8217;t buy it. Maybe eBay has some kind of grand vision that I&#8217;m not seeing &#8212; or maybe it&#8217;s just desperate for growth of any kind. Scot Wingo at eBay Strategies has <a href=\"http:\/\/ebaystrategies.blogs.com\/ebay_strategies\/2007\/05\/ebay_stumbleupo.html\">some more thoughts<\/a> on it, and Valleywag says the only explanation is that eBay just has <a href=\"http:\/\/valleywag.com\/tech\/notag\/ebay-close-to-acquisition-of-stumble-upon-258875.php\">way too much money<\/a> on its hands from its online auction monopoly.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>They&#8217;re baaaack. The rumours about eBay buying StumbleUpon have resurfaced, but this time it&#8217;s the Wall Street Journal that is breathing new life into the story &#8212; a tale that was sparked first by TechCrunch back in April. At that point, the site &#8212; which was created by Garrett Camp and two university friends in &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/05\/09\/ebay-and-stumbleupon-rumour-still-alive\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;eBay and StumbleUpon rumour still alive&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}