{"id":120,"date":"2005-12-16T15:07:27","date_gmt":"2005-12-16T20:07:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/index.php\/2005\/12\/16\/google-to-take-stake-in-aol\/"},"modified":"2005-12-16T15:07:27","modified_gmt":"2005-12-16T20:07:27","slug":"google-to-take-stake-in-aol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2005\/12\/16\/google-to-take-stake-in-aol\/","title":{"rendered":"Hey Google &#8212; You&#8217;ve got AOL!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>According to a blizzard of reports, starting with the Wall Street Journal and now including the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/12\/16\/technology\/16cnd-aol.html\">New York Times<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/16\/AR2005121601057.html\">Washington Post<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/today.reuters.com\/news\/newsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&amp;storyID=2005-12-16T185425Z_01_ROB667161_RTRUKOC_0_US-MEDIA-TIMEWARNER-AOL.xml\">Reuters<\/a>, Google is close to a deal to take a five-per-cent stake in America Online for $1-billion (U.S.). This, of course, is only the latest in a series of rumours about what&#8217;s going to happen to AOL &#8211; first Microsoft was close to a deal to buy the whole enchilada, then Google&#8217;s&#8217;s name was brought up, then Microsoft was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/markets\/2005\/12\/12\/microsoft-google-aol-1212markets03.html\">seen as being back on top<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>At one point, the speculation was that Time Warner CEO Dick Parsons was trying to get the takeover rumours going so that he could <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20051207\/ap_on_hi_te\/aol_microsoft_google\">cut a better deal with Google<\/a>, which AOL uses to power its search results. Then AOL founder Steve Case came out with his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/10\/AR2005121000099.html\">impassioned plea<\/a> to split up the company &#8211; the same thing Carl Icahn seems to want to do &#8211; in an op-ed piece in the Washington Post, which I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/index.php\/2005\/12\/10\/does-steve-case-want-aol-back\/\">wrote about<\/a>, and which was hilariously satirized in a commentary piece <a href=\"http:\/\/publications.mediapost.com\/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=37451\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Most analysts seem to think that Google taking a piece of AOL &#8211; if only so that Microsoft or Yahoo don&#8217;t get it &#8211; makes sense. The former walled wasteland&#8230; er, garden is estimated to account for <a href=\"http:\/\/news.com.com\/Microsoft,+Google+still+vying+for+AOL\/2100-1030_3-5985418.html\">about 11 per cent<\/a> of Google&#8217;s annual search revenue, and that wouldn&#8217;t be a good thing to give up. And it&#8217;s only a billion, right? Pocket change for a company with a market value of almost <a href=\"http:\/\/finance.yahoo.com\/q\/ks?s=GOOG\">$130-billion<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Several people, including <a href=\"http:\/\/radar.oreilly.com\/\">O&#8217;Reilly Radar<\/a> and John Battelle, have noticed a potentially ominous sentence in the New York Times piece: &#8220;Google, which prides itself on the purity of its search results, agreed to give favored placement to content from AOL throughout its site, something it has never done before.&#8221; Don&#8217;t <a href=\"http:\/\/battellemedia.com\/archives\/002135.php\">jump the shark<\/a>, says Battelle. Henry Blodget says it&#8217;s a good deal for Google, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.internetoutsider.com\/2005\/12\/time_warner_aol.html\">a bad one for Microsoft<\/a>. And Rafat over at paidcontent.org has a nice roundup of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.paidcontent.org\/pc\/arch\/2005_12_17.shtml#052855\">various twists and turns<\/a> this story has taken.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to a blizzard of reports, starting with the Wall Street Journal and now including the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Reuters, Google is close to a deal to take a five-per-cent stake in America Online for $1-billion (U.S.). This, of course, is only the latest in a series of rumours about what&#8217;s &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2005\/12\/16\/google-to-take-stake-in-aol\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Hey Google &#8212; You&#8217;ve got AOL!&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}