{"id":11704,"date":"2016-05-26T01:20:00","date_gmt":"2016-05-26T06:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=11704"},"modified":"2024-12-06T15:47:53","modified_gmt":"2024-12-06T20:47:53","slug":"targeted-for-destruction-by-a-billionaire-gawker-puts-itself-up-for-sale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2016\/05\/26\/targeted-for-destruction-by-a-billionaire-gawker-puts-itself-up-for-sale\/","title":{"rendered":"Targeted for destruction by a billionaire, Gawker puts itself up for sale"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"525\" height=\"263\" data-attachment-id=\"269672\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2016\/08\/15\/here-are-the-most-likely-bidders-in-gawker-medias-bankruptcy-auction\/image-403\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/image-6.png?fit=1200%2C600&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1200,600\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/image-6.png?fit=525%2C263&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/image-6.png?resize=525%2C263&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-269672\" style=\"width:900px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/image-6.png?resize=1024%2C512&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/image-6.png?resize=300%2C150&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/image-6.png?resize=768%2C384&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/image-6.png?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gawker Media, the New York-based blog network founded by Nick Denton, has&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2016\/01\/20\/gawker-funding\/\">already had to seek outside funding<\/a>&nbsp;from a Russian investment fund as a result of a $140 million judgement recently won by former wrestler Hulk Hogan. Now, the company is said to be exploring a sale of some or all of its assets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The only question is: Who would agree to buy it knowing that billionaire Peter Thiel is determined to destroy it by whatever means necessary?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Earlier estimates, including&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2014\/12\/14\/the-gospel-according-to-nick-denton-what-next-for-the-gawker-founder.html\">one from Nick Denton<\/a>&nbsp;himself, have pegged Gawker\u2019s value at about $250 million. Any offer for the company\u2019s assets, however, would have to include a potential payment of as much as $140 million to Hulk Hogan and Peter Thiel, so a bid of $50 million or so is still within the ballpark of what Gawker is theoretically worth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In an emailed statement, a Gawker spokesman said that nothing has changed, and that the company has \u201calways said we\u2019re exploring contingency plans of various sorts\u201d in case the Hogan judgment is upheld on appeal. The spokesman went on to say:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Note<\/strong>: This was\u00a0originally published\u00a0at Fortune, where I was a senior writer from 2015 to 2017<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everyone take a breath. We\u2019ve had bankers engaged for quite some time given the need for contingency planning around Facebook board member Peter Thiel\u2019s revenge campaign \u2014 that\u2019s how the Columbus Nova investment was arranged. We recently engaged Mark Patricof to advise us and that seems to have stirred up some excitement, when the fact is that nothing is new.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That\u2019s not quite accurate, however. There is one thing that is new, and it\u2019s pretty significant. Everyone now knows that a billionaire has targeted Gawker Media for destruction because Peter Thiel&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/05\/26\/business\/dealbook\/peter-thiel-tech-billionaire-reveals-secret-war-with-gawker.html?_r=0\">gave an interview<\/a>&nbsp;to the&nbsp;<em>New York Times<\/em>&nbsp;in which he said exactly that. It\u2019s not just about a single case\u2014it\u2019s about a multi-year plan to fund multiple lawsuits against Gawker in the hope of shutting it down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What is true is that Denton appears to have already explored multiple ways of funding the company in the event of a financially-crippling Hogan win. The Gawker founder&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2015\/07\/27\/is-this-nick-denton-s-exit-strategy-from-gawker.html\">has reportedly had talks<\/a>&nbsp;in the past with billionaire venture capitalist Mark Cuban as well as eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar, who already funds his own independent media entity, First Look Media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gawker has also reportedly&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/nypost.com\/2016\/04\/15\/univision-kicks-tires-on-partnering-with-cash-strapped-gawker\/\">had talks<\/a>&nbsp;with Univision in the past, and according to the&nbsp;<em>Financial Times<\/em>, media entrepreneur Jay Penske \u2014 who owns Variety magazine \u2014&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/intl\/cms\/s\/0\/5e8ede72-231b-11e6-aa98-db1e01fabc0c.html\">has expressed an interest<\/a>&nbsp;in possibly acquiring Gawker.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There have been some hints in the past that Omidyar and Denton&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pando.com\/2015\/07\/28\/gawker-intercepted\/\">might be working on a merger<\/a>&nbsp;of some kind. The two have already swapped staff in a number of cases, including Gawker editor John Cook, who spent a year as editor of First Look before returning to Gawker, and Alex Pareene, who worked at First Look before returning to Gawker. On Friday, meanwhile, the&nbsp;<em>Post<\/em>&nbsp;reported that Omidyar was&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/nypost.com\/2016\/05\/27\/ebay-founder-backing-gawkers-appeal-of-hulk-sex-tape-verdict\/\">helping Gawker in its fight<\/a>&nbsp;against Hogan and trying to convince other media companies to do likewise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whether Gawker would mesh with First Look culturally is a different question\u2014or whether it would fit with any other media outlet, for that matter. In some circles, Denton is seen as the author of his own misfortune in the sense that the site\u2019s cavalier approach to privacy and pushing the boundaries of newsworthiness have made it a pariah. Even those who criticize Thiel for funding the Hogan lawsuit seem to find it hard to support the company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From a purely financial point of view, there may have been companies and investors who were willing to buy a stake in Gawker before Peter Thiel\u2019s involvement became public on the assumption that it might win the Hogan case on appeal or that damages might be reduced. But now&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2016\/05\/25\/gawker-hogan-thiel\/?iid=leftrail\">it has become obvious that<\/a>&nbsp;there is a billionaire who is committed to a long-term campaign to wipe out Gawker by funding lawsuits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Who in their right mind would take on that kind of challenge? Is there a billionaire who wants to go head-to-head with Thiel or who feels a passionate commitment to free speech and freedom of the press and is willing to put his or her money on the line? That feels a little like hoping for a white knight carrying the Holy Grail to appear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If someone did invest in or acquire Gawker, the only real option available would be to somehow fundamentally alter the company in order to make a continued financial vendetta by Thiel unlikely. Denton would have to be removed completely, and certain parts of the site might have to be sold or shut down. Valleywag, the gossip blog that wrote articles about Thiel\u2014including one that outed him publicly as being gay\u2014has already ceased to exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a sense, Thiel appears to win either way. Either he is successful in his legal campaign to bankrupt the company and it has to shut down, or it has to sell itself to the highest bidder and change the nature of what it publishes and why. The only difference is whether Denton comes out of it with some money or not.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gawker Media, the New York-based blog network founded by Nick Denton, has&nbsp;already had to seek outside funding&nbsp;from a Russian investment fund as a result of a $140 million judgement recently won by former wrestler Hulk Hogan. Now, the company is said to be exploring a sale of some or all of its assets. The only &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2016\/05\/26\/targeted-for-destruction-by-a-billionaire-gawker-puts-itself-up-for-sale\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Targeted for destruction by a billionaire, Gawker puts itself up for sale&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":true,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fortune"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11704"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11704\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":269766,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11704\/revisions\/269766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}