{"id":11492,"date":"2015-11-09T05:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-11-09T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=11492"},"modified":"2024-12-06T16:46:17","modified_gmt":"2024-12-06T21:46:17","slug":"facebook-and-the-media-have-an-increasingly-landlord-tenant-style-relationship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2015\/11\/09\/facebook-and-the-media-have-an-increasingly-landlord-tenant-style-relationship\/","title":{"rendered":"Facebook and the media have an increasingly landlord-tenant style relationship"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A growing number of online publishers, including giants like BuzzFeed, have come to rely on Facebook for a significant proportion of their traffic \u2014 in some cases as much as 60% of it. For the most part it’s a win-win relationship, with Facebook providing reach and a share of advertising revenue, in exchange for a supply of engaging content. But every now and then, we get a glimpse behind the curtain at just how much power that relationship gives to Facebook, and the consequences if it changes its mind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We got another one of those on Monday, courtesy of a report from Digiday about some new numbers from SimpleReach, an online analytics company. According to the firm’s latest survey, the top 30 publishers in terms of visibility on Facebook have seen their traffic plummet<\/a> by more than 30% since the beginning of the year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While SimpleReach said that some publishers saw an increase in traffic from Facebook \u2014 including Vice Media and Refinery29 \u2014 the majority saw it fall. And to compound the problem, the more reliant a media outlet was on the social network, the more they saw their traffic from Facebook drop this year: The Huffington Post saw a decline of more than 60%, and BuzzFeed saw its Facebook referrals fall by more than 40%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Note<\/strong>: This was\u00a0originally published\u00a0at Fortune, where I was a senior writer from 2015 to 2017<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Why did this happen? To put it simply, no one knows \u2014 perhaps not even Facebook. Something changed, but it’s unclear what. As I’ve tried<\/a> to describe a number<\/a> of times, the reality of the media’s relationship with the giant social network is that it holds all the cards. It controls access to its 1.5 billion or so users, and it does this by tweaking the algorithm that determines which updates appear in a particular user’s news feed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It’s like Facebook not only controls the trucks and satellites and newsstands that supply your newspaper, but also the layout and selection of the stories that appear in it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This creates a number of potential issues, including the fact that a surprisingly large proportion of Facebook users are apparently unaware<\/a> that the social network filters what they see and when they see it. Facebook also routinely censors<\/a> content for a number of reasons, which is (or should be) problematic for media companies who are entering into a close relationship with the company. And yet, it has such a massive amount of reach that media entities of all kinds have to use it, whether they want to or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the survey results from SimpleReach and others show, however, hitching your wagon to Facebook brings with it a number of significant risks, and one of the most obvious is that the social network will change the rules<\/a> of the game without telling you. In other words, things that used to work for media companies might suddenly stop working, whether it’s “curiosity gap” style headlines or auto-play videos or photos of cats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Facebook, meanwhile, suggested in a statement to Digiday that part of the problem is so many media companies and publishers are posting so much of their content to the network that everyone’s reach essentially declines:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

“As the number of posts to Facebook has increased substantially over the past few months, there has been a corresponding increase in the amount of potential posts to show any one person, which impacts reach. In this newly competitive landscape, we\u2019re seeing results vary by publisher: some are experiencing continued growth in referral traffic while others have seen declines.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Publishers have been down this road before: Several major newspapers, including the Washington Post<\/em> and The Guardian<\/em>, created social-reading apps and got millions of followers in 2012. Then Facebook changed the rules, and their content essentially disappeared<\/a> from view, along with most of those new readers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This helps explain why some are so cautious about Instant Articles, which is Facebook’s offer to publishers of a fast-loading mobile version of their content, provided that content is hosted completely on Facebook. That and a new feature\/app called Notify<\/a> look to many like a way of locking media providers and their content into the Facebook platform for good. But who benefits the most from this relationship?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other nagging fear for media companies is that Facebook is essentially engaging in a large-scale bait and switch, by encouraging them to host all of their content on its platform, but then gradually turning off the traffic tap so that their reach declines. At that point, the social network can recommend a number of ways to boost the reach again \u2014 including by paying for promoted posts and other forms of advertising.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You can follow Mathew Ingram on Twitter at @mathewi<\/a>, and read all of his posts here<\/a> or via his RSS feed<\/a>. And please subscribe to Data Sheet<\/a>, Fortune\u2019s daily newsletter on the business of technology.<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A growing number of online publishers, including giants like BuzzFeed, have come to rely on Facebook for a significant proportion of their traffic \u2014 in some cases as much as 60% of it. For the most part it’s a win-win relationship, with Facebook providing reach and a share of advertising revenue, in exchange for a … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Facebook and the media have an increasingly landlord-tenant style relationship”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":true,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fortune"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11492"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11492\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":269796,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11492\/revisions\/269796"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}