{"id":11103,"date":"2015-04-23T13:21:19","date_gmt":"2015-04-23T17:21:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/?p=11103"},"modified":"2015-04-23T13:21:19","modified_gmt":"2015-04-23T17:21:19","slug":"facebook-tweaks-its-algorithm-again-news-publishers-could-pay-the-price","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2015\/04\/23\/facebook-tweaks-its-algorithm-again-news-publishers-could-pay-the-price\/","title":{"rendered":"Facebook tweaks its algorithm again, news publishers could pay the price"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>Even as Facebook <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/03\/24\/business\/media\/facebook-may-host-news-sites-content.html?_r=0\">tries to convince<\/a> news publishers like the New York Times to publish directly on its platform &#8212; instead of just posting excerpts with links to their websites &#8212; the company continues to demonstrate why that is such a Faustian bargain. On Tuesday, for example, the social-networking behemoth <a href=\"http:\/\/media.fb.com\/2015\/04\/21\/news-feed-fyi-balancing-content-from-friends-and-pages\/\">announced some new tweaks<\/a> to its news-feed algorithm, and warned that publishers might see a decline in &#8220;post reach and referral traffic&#8221; as a result.<\/p>\n<p>In its post about the new changes, Facebook tried to soften the blow by pointing out that referral traffic to media publishers <a href=\"http:\/\/media.fb.com\/2015\/04\/21\/news-feed-fyi-balancing-content-from-friends-and-pages\/\">has more than doubled<\/a> in the past 18 months, and that it is always trying to help publishers find the right audience for their content by &#8220;optimizing how it is discovered and consumed.&#8221; The problem, of course, is that no one really knows what Facebook means by terms like optimization. Does it mean choosing the most high-quality content? Showing users what they want? Some combination of both? It&#8217;s unclear.<\/p>\n<p>What is clear is that news publishers &#8212; and media companies of all kinds &#8212; have no real choice when it comes to dealing with Facebook, regardless of the terms of engagement. The social network is one of the largest digital platforms in existence, with a global audience of more than 1.4 billion, and it is also the way in which a majority of younger users find their news. Choosing to avoid Facebook simply isn&#8217;t an option if you want your content to be found.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, how Facebook feels about your content can differ from one moment to the next. Fans of the social-gaming company Zynga know this all too well: games like Farmville were once worth hundreds of millions of dollars because they were promoted by Facebook &#8212; but that vast audience disintegrated almost overnight when the social platform changed its algorithm.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s ironic about the latest negotiations with publishers is that news companies <a href=\"https:\/\/gigaom.com\/2012\/12\/13\/guardian-kills-its-facebook-social-reader-regains-control-over-its-content\/\">got much the same treatment<\/a> not long ago: several outlets created &#8220;social reader&#8221; applications that built up millions of readers, until the social platform changed its mind again and downgraded their content, and those readers vanished.<\/p>\n<p>(<em>This is just an excerpt. You can find <a href=\"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/04\/22\/facebook-newsfeed-algorithm-publishers\/\">the rest of this piece<\/a> at Fortune<\/em>)<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Facebook&#8217;s algorithm changes reinforce the fact that the site ultimately controls how news content is discovered and shared &#8212; but publishers have no choice but to play ball<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11103"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}