{"id":102,"date":"2005-12-10T21:32:48","date_gmt":"2005-12-10T21:32:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/index.php\/2005\/12\/10\/does-steve-case-want-aol-back\/"},"modified":"2005-12-10T21:32:48","modified_gmt":"2005-12-10T21:32:48","slug":"does-steve-case-want-aol-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2005\/12\/10\/does-steve-case-want-aol-back\/","title":{"rendered":"Does Steve Case want AOL back?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Cynthia Brumfield over at IPDemocracy.com points to a fascinating opinion piece by AOL founder Steve Case that appears in Sunday&#8217;s Washington Post (which obviously appears on the website Saturday night). In the piece, Case argues that the merger between America Online and Time Warner &#8212; which was actually a $165-billion acquisition of Time Warner &#8212; hasn&#8217;t worked, and therefore <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/10\/AR2005121000099.html\">the two companies should be split apart again<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Cynthia notes that complaining about a lack of integration between Time Warner and AOL is a little disingenuous, considering AOL was the one in the driver&#8217;s seat after the deal closed, and Case himself became chairman (although <a href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/technology\/ecommerce\/2002\/05\/17\/0517levin.html\">Time Warner chairman Gerald Levin<\/a> was CEO). In fact, there were reports at the time that Time Warner executives were more than a little peeved at being sidelined by their counterparts at the online company. As the dot-com bubble deflated, of course, it became harder and harder to justify that, and Time Warner reasserted control.<\/p>\n<p>In any case &#8212; no pun intended &#8212; the AOL founder says that by last July he had come to the conclusion that the company should be split not just in two, but into four: Time Warner Cable, Time Warner Entertainment, Time and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aol.com\">AOL<\/a>. The board disagreed, and Case left. At the end of his piece, it&#8217;s clear that he would like to draw a comparison between AOL&#8217;s somewhat tattered reputation and another company that was once dismissed as a has-been: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apple.com\">Apple<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s unlikely AOL would ever be able to pull off a similar rejuvenation, however, since it would likely be bought by Microsoft or Google first.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Mark Evans says the piece is part of Steve Case&#8217;s ongoing attempts at <a href=\"http:\/\/evans.blogware.com\/blog\/_archives\/2005\/12\/11\/1445382.html\">&#8220;reputation rehab.&#8221;<\/a> And Om Malik writes a post in which he appears to be comparing Case to <a href=\"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/2005\/12\/10\/et-tu-steve-case\/\">Brutus in Julius Caesar<\/a>. As I mentioned in a comment on Om&#8217;s blog, I think he&#8217;s being a little hard on Case. I\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2m not saying he\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2s a candidate for sainthood, and much of what he did at AOL made things worse instead of better. But he didn\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2t manufacture the market value that allowed AOL to take over Time Warner, nor did he slip something into Gerald Levin\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2s coffee that made him or the board accept the deal.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cynthia Brumfield over at IPDemocracy.com points to a fascinating opinion piece by AOL founder Steve Case that appears in Sunday&#8217;s Washington Post (which obviously appears on the website Saturday night). In the piece, Case argues that the merger between America Online and Time Warner &#8212; which was actually a $165-billion acquisition of Time Warner &#8212; &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2005\/12\/10\/does-steve-case-want-aol-back\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Does Steve Case want AOL back?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}