{"id":1017,"date":"2007-02-22T20:29:35","date_gmt":"2007-02-23T01:29:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/02\/22\/papers-do-video-with-mixed-results\/"},"modified":"2007-02-22T20:29:35","modified_gmt":"2007-02-23T01:29:35","slug":"papers-do-video-with-mixed-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/02\/22\/papers-do-video-with-mixed-results\/","title":{"rendered":"Papers do video, with mixed results"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As the word &#8220;paper&#8221; becomes less and less a part of the newspaper world, things like video are becoming more and more common. While there are some exceptionally well-designed video efforts out there &#8212; such as the Washington Post&#8217;s OnBeing, which I <a href=\"http:\/\/mathewingram.com\/media\/2007\/02\/09\/washington-post-does-video\/\">wrote about recently<\/a> &#8212; there are also some that are, well&#8230; underwhelming, if that&#8217;s a word. <\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"left\"  id=\"image200\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mathewingram.com\/media\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/02\/video-camera.jpg?w=250\" alt=\"video-camera.jpg\" \/>Paul Bradshaw of the Online Journalism blog says that his hometown newspaper in Bolton is one of those that <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com\/2007\/02\/20\/online-video-can-it-get-any-worse-than-this\/\">seems to be struggling<\/a> with the whole concept. In fact, Paul says its efforts are &#8220;the worst attempt at online video I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve seen so far.&#8221; And Kurt Anderson has a piece at New York magazine in which he writes about some of the <a href=\"http:\/\/nymag.com\/news\/imperialcity\/28152\/index.html\">video work<\/a> that the New York Times has been doing &#8212; including film critic David Carr&#8217;s Oscar blog Carpetbagger. He also mentions David Pogue&#8217;s tech videos, which I have to confess I find exceptionally irritating. But maybe that&#8217;s just me.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the online archives of U.S. papers are thousands of videos, among them dozens of exceptional short docs, more like miniature Frontlines or public-radio-with-pictures than like network-news segments, available anytime. This is video-journalism-on-demand.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other recent newspaper video news, the New York Times just announced that it is going to dip its toes into the &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; field by allowing couples who want to be featured in the wedding announcements to send in video talking about how they met, or a clip from their wedding. Fittingly enough, an NYT staffer describes the effort <a href=\"http:\/\/video.google.com\/videoplay?docid=-1734904945544571802&amp;hl=en\">in a Google video interview<\/a>, and says that the paper decided to do it as a way of experimenting with video.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>In a followup post, Paul says he came across some video at the Eastern Daily Press website that <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com\/2007\/02\/22\/online-video-how-it-should-be-done\/\">fits his definition<\/a> of really well-done video content.<\/p>\n<div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the word &#8220;paper&#8221; becomes less and less a part of the newspaper world, things like video are becoming more and more common. While there are some exceptionally well-designed video efforts out there &#8212; such as the Washington Post&#8217;s OnBeing, which I wrote about recently &#8212; there are also some that are, well&#8230; underwhelming, if &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/2007\/02\/22\/papers-do-video-with-mixed-results\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Papers do video, with mixed results&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crsspst_to_mathewingramblogwordpresscom":false,"mf2_syndication":[],"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1017"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1017\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mathewingram.com\/work\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}