<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MediaPost: Is print doomed or not&#63;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/10/22/mediapost-is-print-doomed-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/10/22/mediapost-is-print-doomed-or-not/</link>
	<description>...watching the intersection of the Web and media</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pieter Ardinois</title>
		<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/10/22/mediapost-is-print-doomed-or-not/#comment-9572</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter Ardinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/10/22/mediapost-is-print-doomed-or-not/#comment-9572</guid>
		<description>It's indeed really sad to see such people finding, rather irrelevant and silly, arguments to defend print's future.   I think that we need to see print as a valuable way to communicate.  We only need to have another mindset towards production of print.  Method over material: when is it appropriate to print and when do we go digital.  Holding on to history's succesfull print concepts isn't the right way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s indeed really sad to see such people finding, rather irrelevant and silly, arguments to defend print&#8217;s future.   I think that we need to see print as a valuable way to communicate.  We only need to have another mindset towards production of print.  Method over material: when is it appropriate to print and when do we go digital.  Holding on to history&#8217;s succesfull print concepts isn&#8217;t the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
