Comments on: Washington Post does video http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/ ...watching the intersection of the Web and media Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:33:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: WashPost ramps up the video content » mathewingram.com/media http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-1654 WashPost ramps up the video content » mathewingram.com/media Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:43:27 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-1654 [...] Paul Kapustka, one of the writers at Om Malik’s NewTeeVee, has a great look at the Washington Post’s increasing use of video, which started with the great OnBeing feature (the brainchild of multimedia wizard Rob Curley) and has grown to include video reports from the field and all kinds of great content. As Kapustka says of the video report from Dana Milbank in Washington, who was at a congressional committee hearing: “[It] shows how powerful off-the-cuff video can be, pairing the rich (looks like HD) visual images with the deep background and snark of a beat reporter. [...] […] Paul Kapustka, one of the writers at Om Malik’s NewTeeVee, has a great look at the Washington Post’s increasing use of video, which started with the great OnBeing feature (the brainchild of multimedia wizard Rob Curley) and has grown to include video reports from the field and all kinds of great content. As Kapustka says of the video report from Dana Milbank in Washington, who was at a congressional committee hearing: “[It] shows how powerful off-the-cuff video can be, pairing the rich (looks like HD) visual images with the deep background and snark of a beat reporter. […]

]]> By: Papers do video, with mixed results » mathewingram.com/work http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-963 Papers do video, with mixed results » mathewingram.com/work Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:29:49 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-963 [...] As the word “paper” becomes less and less a part of the newspaper world, things like video are becoming more and more common. While there are some exceptionally well-designed video efforts out there — such as the Washington Post’s OnBeing, which I wrote about recently — there are also some that are, well… underwhelming, if that’s a word. [...] […] As the word “paper” becomes less and less a part of the newspaper world, things like video are becoming more and more common. While there are some exceptionally well-designed video efforts out there — such as the Washington Post’s OnBeing, which I wrote about recently — there are also some that are, well… underwhelming, if that’s a word. […]

]]> By: Papers do video, with mixed results » mathewingram.com/media http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-955 Papers do video, with mixed results » mathewingram.com/media Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:11:57 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-955 [...] As the word “paper” becomes less and less a part of the newspaper world, things like video are becoming more and more common. While there are some exceptionally well-designed video efforts out there — such as the Washington Post’s OnBeing, which I wrote about recently — there are also some that are, well… underwhelming, if that’s a word. [...] […] As the word “paper” becomes less and less a part of the newspaper world, things like video are becoming more and more common. While there are some exceptionally well-designed video efforts out there — such as the Washington Post’s OnBeing, which I wrote about recently — there are also some that are, well… underwhelming, if that’s a word. […]

]]> By: Why always with the monetizing? » mathewingram.com/media http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-804 Why always with the monetizing? » mathewingram.com/media Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:23:39 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-804 [...] Courtesy of Lucas Grindley’s blog comes a comment from Rob Curley, the digital media whiz-kid behind the Washington Post’s great new OnBeing video feature, which I wrote about here. In a comment on Melissa Worden’s blog, Rob responds to questions about how the new feature can be monetized: I’m going to say something that I’ve never said in my 10 years as an online journalist: I don’t care how it’s monetized. Don’t get me wrong: I love capitalism. I want our newspaper to make money hand-over-fist so that we can continue to do journalism that matters, but … [...] […] Courtesy of Lucas Grindley’s blog comes a comment from Rob Curley, the digital media whiz-kid behind the Washington Post’s great new OnBeing video feature, which I wrote about here. In a comment on Melissa Worden’s blog, Rob responds to questions about how the new feature can be monetized: I’m going to say something that I’ve never said in my 10 years as an online journalist: I don’t care how it’s monetized. Don’t get me wrong: I love capitalism. I want our newspaper to make money hand-over-fist so that we can continue to do journalism that matters, but … […]

]]> By: Mathew Ingram http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-776 Mathew Ingram Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:32:30 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-776 Thanks for that, Jeff. Thanks for that, Jeff.

]]> By: Jeffrey Goth http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-774 Jeffrey Goth Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:18:51 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-774 And they've been doing video for years. They were really the first and it's all right here, hours of documentary video: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/special/4/ And they’ve been doing video for years. They were really the first and it’s all right here, hours of documentary video:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/special/4/

]]> By: Howard Owens http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-728 Howard Owens Sat, 10 Feb 2007 04:34:53 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-728 Thanks ... FYI ... Rob answered the quesitons ... good answers, too. Thanks … FYI … Rob answered the quesitons … good answers, too.

]]> By: Mathew http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-717 Mathew Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:29:11 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-717 Thanks for the comment, Howard. I didn't mean to imply that you were being critical, although that may be the way it came out. I thought they were very good questions. Thanks for the comment, Howard. I didn’t mean to imply that you were being critical, although that may be the way it came out. I thought they were very good questions.

]]> By: Howard Owens http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-711 Howard Owens Fri, 09 Feb 2007 05:18:47 +0000 http://mathewingram.com/media/2007/02/09/washington-post-does-video/#comment-711 I don't think I'm being critical in my questions ... Rob promises an answer, btw. I don’t think I’m being critical in my questions … Rob promises an answer, btw.

]]>