<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC will pay you for photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/</link>
	<description>...watching the intersection of the Web and media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Have cellphone-camera, will report &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Have cellphone-camera, will report &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathewingram.com/media/?p=94#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] The issue of payment continues to be one of the major sticking points in these efforts, which Seth Finkelstein likes to call &#8220;digital sharecropping.&#8221; The BBC has said that it will pay those who submit photos or videos, but only if they are significant in some way &#8212; and what would qualify as significant remains to be defined (would video of Michael Richards having a racist meltdown qualify?). Reuters plans to pay if photos are distributed to media outlets, but not if they just appear on Yahoo: Users will not be paid for images displayed on the Yahoo and Reuters sites. But people whose photos or videos are selected for distribution to Reuters clients will receive a payment. Mr. Ahearn said the company had not yet figured out how to structure those payments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The issue of payment continues to be one of the major sticking points in these efforts, which Seth Finkelstein likes to call &#8220;digital sharecropping.&#8221; The BBC has said that it will pay those who submit photos or videos, but only if they are significant in some way &#8212; and what would qualify as significant remains to be defined (would video of Michael Richards having a racist meltdown qualify?). Reuters plans to pay if photos are distributed to media outlets, but not if they just appear on Yahoo: Users will not be paid for images displayed on the Yahoo and Reuters sites. But people whose photos or videos are selected for distribution to Reuters clients will receive a payment. Mr. Ahearn said the company had not yet figured out how to structure those payments. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; Have cellphone-camera, will report</title>
		<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; Have cellphone-camera, will report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathewingram.com/media/?p=94#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] The issue of payment continues to be one of the major sticking points in these efforts, which Seth Finkelstein likes to call &#8220;digital sharecropping.&#8221; The BBC has said that it will pay those who submit photos or videos, but only if they are significant in some way &#8212; and what would qualify as significant remains to be defined (would video of Michael Richards having a racist meltdown qualify?). Reuters plans to pay if photos are distributed to media outlets, but not if they just appear on Yahoo: Users will not be paid for images displayed on the Yahoo and Reuters sites. But people whose photos or videos are selected for distribution to Reuters clients will receive a payment. Mr. Ahearn said the company had not yet figured out how to structure those payments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The issue of payment continues to be one of the major sticking points in these efforts, which Seth Finkelstein likes to call &#8220;digital sharecropping.&#8221; The BBC has said that it will pay those who submit photos or videos, but only if they are significant in some way &#8212; and what would qualify as significant remains to be defined (would video of Michael Richards having a racist meltdown qualify?). Reuters plans to pay if photos are distributed to media outlets, but not if they just appear on Yahoo: Users will not be paid for images displayed on the Yahoo and Reuters sites. But people whose photos or videos are selected for distribution to Reuters clients will receive a payment. Mr. Ahearn said the company had not yet figured out how to structure those payments. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathewingram.com/media/?p=94#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Nick. But didn't the Guardian story say exactly that? Or do you mean the previous story that quoted Pete Clifton as saying the BBC wouldn't pay? In any case, I appreciate you stopping by -- and the Flickr idea is indeed a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Nick. But didn&#8217;t the Guardian story say exactly that? Or do you mean the previous story that quoted Pete Clifton as saying the BBC wouldn&#8217;t pay? In any case, I appreciate you stopping by &#8212; and the Flickr idea is indeed a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google &#8212; have your people call my people &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Google &#8212; have your people call my people &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathewingram.com/media/?p=94#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] -- My media blog: Current featured post is "BBC will pay you for photos" [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[&#8230;] &#8212; My media blog: Current featured post is &#8220;BBC will pay you for photos&#8221; [&#8230;]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathewingram.com/media/?p=94#comment-22</guid>
		<description>This story in the Guardian is misleading. We've never said we will absolutely never pay for pictures, just that such payments will be exceptional. 

And we are already experimenting with using flickr as a way of gathering and filtering photos. For example:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/radio1bigweekend/

(I work for the BBC)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story in the Guardian is misleading. We&#8217;ve never said we will absolutely never pay for pictures, just that such payments will be exceptional. </p>
<p>And we are already experimenting with using flickr as a way of gathering and filtering photos. For example:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/radio1bigweekend/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/radio1bigweekend/</a></p>
<p>(I work for the BBC)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://mathewingram.com/media/2006/11/17/bbc-will-pay-you-for-photos/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathewingram.com/media/?p=94#comment-21</guid>
		<description>If they were smart they'd set up a pool on Flickr for submissions and let the community filter out the great ones. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they were smart they&#8217;d set up a pool on Flickr for submissions and let the community filter out the great ones. <img src='http://mathewingram.com/media/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
